Saida Aisha as the daughter of Abu Bakr, the earliest and strongest friend and follower to the Prophet and first caliph, then as the third and youngest wife of the prophet Himself lived in political environment. She had freedom to speak openly even in front of the prophet Himself, refuse some opinion of His companions and played role in some political matters. Aisha become enraged and spoke out in public and found her way into high politics in the reign of Uthman the third caliph and after his assassination. Orientalists’ assumptions about Aisha and her role in Battle of Camel are based on historical analysis and critical reading of the battle regardless the Islamic values and theological consideration that guide us as Muslims to have fair assessment for this complicated issue. Their analysis for the civil war between Ali Ibnu Abi Talib and Saida Aisha, between him and Mu’awiyah Ibnu Abi Sufian is referring all causes and effects to personal disagreements. Psychological and social analysis is extremely important to our overall assessment of the Battle of the Camel. Ibn al-Jawzi believes that the biggest strife that afflicted religious thought is hermeneutics, for instance, the cause of many civil wars and the deviation of many Muslim sectarianists from the right path is interpretation. Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyyah tended to point out that the verse of Surat al-An'am demonstrates his doctrine which means Allah is examining believers. This paper is adapting descriptive and critical methods in order to reach results based on historical evidence by referring to oriental sources and authentic interpretations of Muslim scholars.

The research aims to define Tafsir Sufi Ishaari and Tafsir Al Bahr Al-Madid by Ibn Ajibah (1809). The research as well will extrapolate Tafsir Sufi Ishaari for Quranic verses in the book which related to the issue of the heart purification. The methodology-for this research in analyzing information depends on the descriptive approach, and on collecting all facts and information. It also uses the analytical and criticism approach by matching the scholarly conditions of acceptance regarding Tafsir Sufi Ishari with what was interpreted by Ibn Al Ajibah. Then compare, evaluate and criticize it. Therefore, the findings indicate that the Tafsir Sufi Ishari-which is one of the types of the Quranic exegesis based on interpretations of verses contrasts the classical commentaries- by Ibn Ajibah in the issue of the heart purification that matching the conditions were based on two foundations. Firstly: The Tafsir Sufi Ishari was interpreted accordingly to general verses meaning and exegesis. Secondly: The relationship between Tafsir Sufi Ishari to al-Ma'thur is like the relationship causes and effect. The study also revealed that the contradictions with conditions ion Tafsir Sufi Ishari in this issue are based on three foundations. Firstly : interpretations of Ibn Ajibah were so far from the common use of Arabic understanding. Secondly: The interpretations made were analogous compared to other normal exegesis. Thirdly: to generalize some issues which are strictly individuals. In facts, if Ibn Ajibah limited his interpretation to his Ishari views there is no differences between him and the doctrine of Shiites Batiniyyah!, But our trust in his scholary' Tafsir, his confirmation of classical interpretation and his condemnation of Batiniyyah understanding make his Tafsir Ishari valid and well concerned.