This study aimed to identify the trends of Jordanian Islamic preachers using social media and its relationship to confronting hate speech, the researcher used the descriptive approach in both its descriptive and analytical aspects. The study was conducted in the context of a sample survey of Islamic Jordanian preachers' publications on Facebook.The researcher used the content analysis tool on a sample of preachers who were represented by six preachers such as Dr. Ahmed Nofal, Muhammad Al-Qudah, Dr. Zaid Al-Masry, Dr. Amjad Quresha, Dr. Iyad Qunaibi, and Dr. Hamza Al-Majali. The study concluded that the nature of publications of Jordanian preachers is religious in general, and the Jordanian preachers' posts on Facebook do not feed hate speech generally, except a limited and narrow scope, and that there are high similarities between preachers in their way for Da'wah

The study aimed to demonstrate the advocacy discourse strategies in the Public Ifts Department's publication via the Facebook network, and the study used the descriptive survey method on the health of the Jordanian Department of Public Ifta on the Facebook network, and with content analysis form tool, the publication were analyzed, and the study concluded that the General Ifta' Department Jordanian used rhetorical strategies commensurate with the data of the communicative environment; She used the emotional, logical, cultural and society strategy and the creation of meanings, and emerged in the use of rhetorical methods of encouragement, reflection and proverbs, then she farmed her publications within the topics of fatwas, sermons and jurisprudence lessons, and finally she used the multimedia of the facebook network in her publication.

The study aimed to identify the concept of hate speech through the discourse of social networks and how the Jordanian legislator differentiated between them and freedom of expression and opinion, and the study used the survey approach on a set of laws regulating hate speech through electronic communication sites, and with the observation tool, the study concluded Jordanian law defined hate speech as "any word or action that would provoke sedition Jordanian law defines freedom of expression as "Everyone has the right to hold opinions without interference, and this right includes freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, whether in writing, in print or in the form of art." or by any other means of his choice, and the Jordanian legislator has stated that everyone has freedom of expression within the framework of the law

The study shed light on intellectual security strategies in persuasive discourse, and how to frame the use of persuasive discourse strategies towards activating intellectual security in society. Rhetorical and persuasive strategies, and with the observation tool, the study concluded that the concept of intellectual security includes commitment to morals, customs, and the regulating and prevailing laws in society, and that persuasive discourse strategies work to organize and frame content in order to reach persuasion, and that Aristotle's persuasive triangle is consistent with rhetorical strategies, research that is consistent The pathos with the solidarity strategy, the ethos interacts in the directive strategy, the logos merges into the allusive strategy and the persuasive strategy, and the solidarity strategies are considered one of the most prominent persuasive strategies in enhancing intellectual security. Reinforced jaw security Irrigation in the process of communication works to preserve the cultural and religious identity in any society.