The works of Nasa’ih al-‘Ibad and Tanqih al-Qaul by Shaykh Nawawi al-Bantani are among the several major works referred to in the Archipelago in Islamic knowledge related to religious advice and aspects of Targhib wa Tarhib. Both works contain many hadiss.However, there is no position of the hadispresented in the two works because the methodology is not as relevant as the methodology of the authoritative work of hadis. Therefore, this study aims to look at the methodology of writing the hadisof the work Nasa’ih al-‘Ibad and Tanqih al-Qaul by Shaykh Nawawi al-Bantani. In addition, this study also does comparative research on the methods of the two works to find out the points of similarities and differences between the two works. The methodology of this study is qualitative through the method of literature and content analysis design of the works of Nasa’ih al-Ibad and Tanqih al-Qaul. This study found that there is a similarity in the methodology of hadiswriting in the work Nasa’ih al-‘Ibad and Tanqih al-Qaul, which is the writing of hadiswithout sanad and only states mukhrij hadisonly, writing hadiswithout sanad and mentioning Rawi al-A’la at the level of Sahabat, using the lafaz (sighat) of Ruwiya and Qala at the beginning of the hadisas well as writing the hadisusing matan (Narrated by bi al-Lafz). While the difference is that in the work Nasa’ih al-‘Ibad Shaykh Nawawi al-Bantani wrote hadiswithout sanad by adding rawi a`la at the level of tabi`in and some additional sighat. In the book Tanqih al-Qaul, he added the method of writing hadiswithout sanad only mentioning Muhkrij al-Hadisand rawi a’la at the beginning of the matan, adding some words or sighat hadisand using the method of stating the source of hadissuch as the name of the wor and the author of the work.