Introduction/Study Objectives: A bioequivalence study was performed to compare the pharmacological profile of innovator etoricoxib (ETO) with a newly developed generic ETO, both in a 120 mg tablet formulation. A dissolution study was conducted to optimize the formulation process before evaluating physical changes in the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the formulated product. Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, balanced, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, two-way crossover, truncated bioequivalence study involving a washout period of ten days. A total of 26 healthy male volunteers were recruited. The pharmacokinetic profile of the test formulation was compared with the reference formulation. Results/Discussion: The pharmacokinetic parameters of ETO were calculated based on the plasma drug concentration-time profile using non-compartmental analysis to determine its safety profile and tolerability. The Test/Reference (T/R) ratio of ETO was 104.36% (90% confidence interval (CI): 98.30%–110.80%) for area under curve (AUC)0-72 while the T/R ratio of maximum concentration (Cmax) was 101.39% (92.15%–111.56%). The 90% CI of the Cmax and AUC0-72 of ETO were within acceptable bioequivalence limits of 80%–125%. All values were within the predetermined limits of the Association of Southeast Asian Nation (ASEAN) bioequivalence guidelines. Conclusion: The test formulation was found to be bioequivalent with respect to the reference drug, according to ASEAN bioequivalence guidelines.

A newly developed branded generic of a moxifloxacin (MOX) 400-mg tablet formulation was manufactured prior to this study. A bioequivalence (BE) study was done to assess the pharmacokinetics of the formulation using a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover, 2-sequence, and single-dose experiment. Thirty healthy male volunteers were recruited. The test formulation, Flonoxin 400 mg, was compared with the reference formulation, Avelox 400 mg. The pharmacokinetic parameters of MOX were calculated based on the plasma drug concentration-time profile. Noncompartmental analysis was performed to determine its safety and tolerability. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 88.5%-104.6%, 96.1%-101.1%, and 96.8%-100.7% for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf, respectively. All CIs were within the 80.0%-125.0% boundary, thus fulfilling the acceptable BE criteria according to the ASEAN guidelines.