Recovery capital is an individual’s total recovery resources based on their strengths. This study examines (1) the most important factor driving the growth of recovery capital among polydrug and non-polydrug drug users, (2) differences in recovery capital, (3) differences in the motivation process to stay sober, and (4) the relationship between recovery capital and treatment motivation. The data was collected randomly using predetermined respondent criteria. The Brief Assessment Recovery Capital-10 and Treatment Motivation Scale were completed by all respondents (n=270). To determine the relationship between Recovery Capital and Treatment Motivation in polydrug users and non-polydrug users, descriptive, T-test, and Pearson correlation analyses were performed. 62.22% of addicts used multiple substances, compared to 37.78% who used only one type of drug. 55 percent of respondents say substance use and sobriety are most important for recovery. “Housing & Safety” and “Risk-Taking Behavior” follow at 48.9%. Polydrug and non-polydrug groups had similar recovery capital (t (268) = 1.46, p = 0.144). Polydrug users had higher scores but lower overall scores. Polydrug and non-polydrug groups have significantly higher Treatment Motivation scores, t(268) = -2.222, p = 0.027. Even though non-polydrug users score higher. Polydrug users have a moderately positive correlation (r (268) = 0.400, p = 0.00), while non-polydrug users have a weak correlation (r (268) = 0.273, p = 0.00). Targeting recovery capital in treatment may improve resources and support networks, reducing relapse. Recovery capital assessments may help tailor multimodal services to an individual’s recovery needs while integrating harm reduction into addiction treatment.

The relationship between resilience levels and work quality among members of the Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM) holds significant importance within the police department. Given the demanding nature of police work, PDRM officers confront high pressure, challenges, and risks. Therefore, comprehending the factors impacting their psychological well-being and work quality, including resilience, offers valuable insights into enhancing the welfare and performance of PDRM officers. This study can improve PDRM officers' psychological welfare by elucidating the relationship between resilience levels and psychological well-being. Consequently, it can inform the development of programs to enhance their psychological welfare. Thus, the main objective of this study is to examine the relationship between the level of resilience and the quality of work among Police Officers, particularly in IPD Seremban. This study involved 292 respondents chosen by the stratified sampling technique and then analyzed using descriptive quantitative research methods and Pearson's correlation analysis. The study's findings reveal a strong positive correlation between the level of resilience and the quality of work among Police Officers in IPD Seremban, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.578. This correlation is statistically significant at the p < 0.001 level, indicating that the quality of work among these officers also tends to increase as resilience levels increase. The findings of this study are essential to provide an overview of the IPD administration and PDRM as well as the relevant ministries regarding the workplace stress scenario faced by workers, especially in the police service sector.