Kajian ini dijalankan bertujuan untuk menganalisis hujah-hujah mengenai isu perselisihan kontrak bay’ ‘inah berdasarkan kaedah tarjih. Kajian ini bertitik tolak daripada perbezaan pendapat di kalangan para ulama terhadap kontrak bay’ ‘inah mengenai keharusannya. Justeru, analisis terhadap hujah-hujah daripada pihak-pihak yang berselisih perlu dijalankan agar dapat ditentukan pendapat yang terpilih berdasarkan kepada kaedah tarjih. Kajian ini bersifat kualitatif iaitu bermula dengan metode kepustakaan iaitu dengan mengumpul data-data kepustakaan daripada bahan-bahan dalam bentuk buku dan jurnal untuk membentuk teori kajian. Kemudian dikenalpasti semua dalil-dalil yang dikemukakan oleh para ulama mengenai kontrak bay’ ‘inah. Kemudian data-data tersebut dianalisis menggunakan kaedah analisis kandungan. Hasil dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa terdapat dua pendapat mengenai kontrak bay’ ‘inah iaitu majoriti ulama berpendapat bahawa bay’ ‘inah adalah haram, sementara minoriti ulama berpendapat bahawa bay’ ‘inah adalah harus. Kajian juga mendapati bahawa pendapat majoriti ulama adalah rajih setelah dianalisis menggunakan kaedah tarjih iaitu kerana kekuatan daripada sudut dalil hadith dan athar sahih yang khusus melarang bay’ ‘inah berbanding penggunaan hujah dalil qiyas yang umum yang digunakan oleh pihak minoriti.

Rasullullah صلى الله عليه وسلم dikurniakan kefasihan dalam bertutur yang tidak dapat disangkal oleh mana-mana sarjana Islam. Namun, para sarjana sintaksis (nahu) bahasa Arab berselisih pendapat sama ada untuk menerima atau menolak hadith sebagai sumber penghujahan (shahid) dalam pengkaedahan sintaksis bahasa Arab. Hal ini bertitik tolak daripada kebanyakan lafaz ḥadīth diriwayatkan dengan makna dan berlakunya laḥn (gubahan) terhadap lafaz ḥadīth kerana terdapat dalam kalangan periwayat yang terdiri daripada bukan Arab. Kajian-kajian lepas menunjukkan antara tokoh sintaksis bahasa Arab yang dikatakan menolak hadith dalam pengkaedahan sintaksis bahasa Arab ialah al-Suyuti. Walau bagaimanapun, terdapat kajian yang mengatakan beliau berada di pertengahan, iaitu di antara menerima dan menolaknya. Sehubungan dengan itu, kajian ini bertujuan untuk melihat perbincangan para pengkaji terhadap pandangan al-Suyuti dalam menerima hadith sebagai sumber pengkaedahan sintaksis bahasa Arab. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan kaedah perolehan data menggunakan analisis kajian-kajian para pengkaji dan hujah-hujah mereka. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan al-Suyuti menerima ḥadīth sebagai sumber penghujahan dalam kaedah sintaksis bahasa Arab tetapi hanya menerima ḥadīth-ḥadīth yang diriwayatkan dengan lafaz Rasulullah صلى الله عليه وسلم dan bertepatan dengan kaedah sintaksis bahasa Arab. Hal ini dapat dibuktikan menerusi pandangan beliau dalam karya al-Iqtirāḥ fī ‘Ilm Uṣūl al-Naḥw dan beliau turut mendatangkan banyak ḥadīth sebagai hujah pengkaedahan sintaksis bahasa Arab dalam karyanya Ham‘ al-Hawāmi‘ fī Sharḥ Jam‘ al-Jawāmi‘ dan kitab al-Ashbāh wa al-Naẓā’ir fī al-Naḥw.

Rasullullah SAW was endowed with eloquence in speaking which could not be denied by any Islamic scholar. However, the scholars of Arabic syntax (grammar) disagree on whether to accept or reject ḥadīth as a source of argument (shahid) in the method of Arabic syntax. This is the starting point of most ḥadīth utterances narrated with meaning and the occurrence of laḥn (composition) on the ḥadīth utterance because it exists among narrators consisting of non-Arabs. Past studies show that among the Arabic syntactic figures who are said to reject hadith in the Arabic syntactic method is al-Suyuti. However, some studies say he is in the middle, which is between accepting and rejecting it. In this regard, this study aims to see the discussion of researchers on al-Suyuti's views in accepting hadith as a source of Arabic syntactic methodology. This study uses a qualitative approach with data acquisition methods utilising the analysis of the researchers' studies and their arguments. The findings show that al-Suyuti accepted ḥadīth as a source of argument in the Arabic syntax method but only accepted the ḥadīths narrated in the words of Rasulullah SAW and coincided with the Arabic syntax method. This can be evidenced by his views in the book of al-Iqtirāḥ fī 'Ilm Uṣūl al-Naḥw and he also brought many ḥadīths as arguments of Arabic syntactic methodology in his books that are Ham‘ al-Hawāmi‘ fī Sharḥ Jam‘ al-Jawāmi‘ and al-Ashbāh wa al-Naẓā’ir fī al-Naḥw.

Syaykh Abdul Fattah Abu Ghuddah (1917-1997) is famous as a contemporary hadith scholar who has contributed so much in the field of hadith expertise and knowledge. However, the researcher was inspired by his work entitled Qimah al-Zaman 'Inda al-Ulama by analyzing his methodology and contribution in gathering the inspirational and unique stories of the scholars of the past throughout their life journey in developing expertise in the field of Islamic knowledge. Therefore, in this article the researcher analyzes the methodology of Qimah al-Zaman 'Inda al-Ulama's work and his contribution to Islamic scholarship in the field of hadith. This qualitative study uses the method of collecting bibliographic data from written sources such as journal articles and written materials related to the topic of the study. The findings of the study found that the value of time is so valuable and the earnestness of the figures of the past scholars throughout their lives in ensuring that the expertise in the field of Islamic knowledge can be utilized by the current generation.

It is affirmed between scholars that al-Isti’nas (leniency in the usage of al-Maghazi and al-Siyar as supporting evidence in argument) of the narration of al-Maghazi and al-Siyar is a process applied by Hadith scholars previously and contemporarily. Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyyah is among the Muslim scholars who apply al-Isti’nas of the narration of al-Maghazi and al-Siyar in his book Zad al-Ma’ad. This study aims at revealing the methodology of Ibn al-Qayyim in the process of al-Isti’nas of the narration of al-Maghazi and al-Siyar in his book Zad al-Ma’ad. This study focuses on terms of al-Isti’nas in his point of view and its areas. This study concludes that al-Isti’nas of the narration of al-Maghazi and al-Siyar in Ibn al-Qayyim’s point of view is abide with certain terms and areas. There are also many benefits as a result of this process.