The works of Nasa’ih al-‘Ibad and Tanqih al-Qaul by Shaykh Nawawi al-Bantani are among the several major works referred to in the Archipelago in Islamic knowledge related to religious advice and aspects of Targhib wa Tarhib. Both works contain many hadiss.However, there is no position of the hadispresented in the two works because the methodology is not as relevant as the methodology of the authoritative work of hadis. Therefore, this study aims to look at the methodology of writing the hadisof the work Nasa’ih al-‘Ibad and Tanqih al-Qaul by Shaykh Nawawi al-Bantani. In addition, this study also does comparative research on the methods of the two works to find out the points of similarities and differences between the two works. The methodology of this study is qualitative through the method of literature and content analysis design of the works of Nasa’ih al-Ibad and Tanqih al-Qaul. This study found that there is a similarity in the methodology of hadiswriting in the work Nasa’ih al-‘Ibad and Tanqih al-Qaul, which is the writing of hadiswithout sanad and only states mukhrij hadisonly, writing hadiswithout sanad and mentioning Rawi al-A’la at the level of Sahabat, using the lafaz (sighat) of Ruwiya and Qala at the beginning of the hadisas well as writing the hadisusing matan (Narrated by bi al-Lafz). While the difference is that in the work Nasa’ih al-‘Ibad Shaykh Nawawi al-Bantani wrote hadiswithout sanad by adding rawi a`la at the level of tabi`in and some additional sighat. In the book Tanqih al-Qaul, he added the method of writing hadiswithout sanad only mentioning Muhkrij al-Hadisand rawi a’la at the beginning of the matan, adding some words or sighat hadisand using the method of stating the source of hadissuch as the name of the wor and the author of the work.

Big Island Melaka is one of Malaysia's historical and religious tourist destinations. However, many people are unaware of the island's historical and religious significance. The purpose of this research is to explore and describe the current state and history of Melaka Big Island as an Islamic tourist destination through content analysis methodology. The results of the study found that the Big Island is a historical island that contributed greatly to the effective spread of Islam in Melaka and its surroundings. The existence of the tomb of Sultan al-Ariffin and other figures is the main attraction for many religious tourists to come to the Big Island to get to know more about the historical side of this Big Island. However, some tourists continue to engage in khurafat activities and violate Islamic restrictions. The Big Island should adopt the idea of Islamic tourism to make it free from aspects of shirk and khurafat as well as cosy and welcoming to visitors. Local authorities need to be concerned about monitoring the activities carried out by visitors to this Big Island. With various studies on programmes and activities that have been carried out, it is hoped that the management of Pulau Besar will be better for the purpose of being recognised as an Islamic tourist destination that is visited by tourists at the local and global levels.

Shihab is an Islamic scholar who has prolifically produced a comprehensive 30 chapters of Qur’anic exegesis entitled Tafsir Al-Mishbah. This book is perceived as the latest Qur’anic exegesis produced by Muslim scholar of the Archipelago. He stresses on the importance of understanding the Qur’an contextually, supported by a strong understanding of the language and not focusing only on the textual meaning. In relation to this, his work has used a lot of linguistics approaches as to obtain the actual verses exegeses. Therefore, this study seeks to analyse critically his linguistics exegesis, and the focus rests on the debate on Qur’anic words. To obtain an explicitness perspective, this study has adopted the library research and document analysis method by making language and reliable popular Qur’anic exegesis books as primary sources of reference. The outcome of this study finds that Shihab had applied five rules in relation to Qur’anic words, all of which have been approved by scholars and exegetes. In addition, this study also found that Shihab absolutely consistent in applying these rules, except in the first rule. By doing so, it was slightly crippled his exegetical work. Finally, this study suggests that it is not possible that a grammatical error occurs in the Qur’an. Indeed, the essence of the Arabic language rules is unparalleled with the structure of the Qur’an, but the arrangement rule was implemented after the Qur’an was revealed. If both cannot be made consistent with one another, then this is due to the limitation of method which is known as shādh.