Volunteerism is very important part of life in any society. It would be very difficult for any society to operate without having anyone or group inside the society itself to exercise duty of volunteerism. Volunteerism normally been associated with the act of being sincere, compassionate, and kindness which a person has towards other people and towards the environment. Volunteerism allow people to be selfless and willing to puts the needs of others before one’s own. These kind of people who volunteer is normally someone who would not think twice about sharing what they have with other people who are in desperate need. Whenever there is tragedies which is beyond the help from the government or any existing institutions, volunteer people will come out and offering all the necessary assistance which they can offered. The spirit of volunteerism also arises when there is no actual tragedies like volunteering in order to assists the poor, the weak, and the needy which existed in the society. Most of the volunteer activities which been carried out are been done sincerely without having the hope to get something in return. Sadly, there are people or group of people who carry out the volunteer activities with the hope to get something in return. The mind set to get something in return for all the volunteerism activities which been carried out along with other arising issues can become major obstacle to have the act of voluntarism in its true sense. As such, it is the aim of the paper to analyse the philosophical idea over the concept of volunteerism itself, aims of volunteerism, types of volunteerism, the status of volunteerism at both international and national level, arising issues on volunteerism, as well as identifying steps to bring back the true spirit of volunteerism which been seen eroded in the modern society.

The topic deals with the impact of the Coronavirus pandemic on contractual obligations according to UAE legislation, and the importance of the topic is focused on the fact that contractual obligations may be vulnerable to impacts by crises that states may face, including health crises, such as the current Coronavirus pandemic, and the preventive measures that followed that were necessary to confront them, Accordingly, the topic aims to determine the impact of the Coronavirus pandemic on contractual obligations, by adapting the Corona pandemic crisis between the theories of emergency conditions and force majeure. The problem arises that the UAE government has taken the initiative to take a package of preventive measures to protect against the spread of the Coronavirus, and it is natural for the imposition of a health emergency to have an impact on the practice of various types of civil and commercial activities. This resulted in the widening of the scope of non-fulfillment of contractual obligations, which calls for thinking. In drawing new perceptions to adapt the legal situation to address contractual imbalances resulting from the inability to fulfill contractual obligations and restore balance to them, which necessitates proposing a new narrative and drawing policies to cross this exceptional phase. To achieve the objectives of the research, the researcher relied on the descriptive approach to study the Coronavirus pandemic as an emergency condition by stating the frameworks of the theory of emergency conditions and their applicability to the circumstances arising from that pandemic, as well as stating the Corona virus crisis as a force majeure. Then we end this post with a conclusion that includes the outcome of our findings with recommendations, which we believe will contribute to illuminating some places of shadow and ambiguities related to the topic.

The procedural system for lawsuits against members of the judiciary in the Federal Decree-Law of the United Arab Emirates No. (42) of 2022 issuing the Civil Procedure Code is one of the important topics, as the Emirati legislator did not want to hold members of the judiciary accountable according to civil liability for any shortcomings that might be committed by them during They carry out their work entrusted to them, just as ordinary employees in the state are held accountable, but rather surround them with special protection and care. The aim of the study is to clarify the concept of a lawsuit against judges and members of the prosecution, its nature and legal basis, clarify its personal and objective scope, and analyze and evaluate its procedures. Therefore, this study uses the descriptive and analytical approach, because it It is compatible with the subject of the study, contributes to achieving and presenting detailed knowledge, and helps to provide major solutions to address the problem of the study, given that this approach deals with the subject in an analytical, comprehensive and integrated manner. Among the results of this study are the following: According to the UAE law, members of the judicial authority are not allowed to claim any compensation for mistakes committed by them during the performance of their duties except through a lawsuit, and that a lawsuit is a lawsuit that is filed against a judge or a member of the Public Prosecution To claim compensation for damages resulting from their implementation of their work, or their implementation of their powers entrusted to them, and cases of litigation cases are available exclusively in the law, such as fraud, fraud, or serious professional error .