Background Imatinib mesylate is a molecularly targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug. It is effectively used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. However, development of resistance to imatinib mesylate as a result of BCR-ABL dependent and BCR-ABL independent mechanisms has emerged as a daunting problem in the management of CML patients. Between these mechanisms, BCR-ABL independent mechanisms are still not robustly understood. Aim To investigate the correlation of HOXA4 and HOXA5 promoter DNA hypermethylation with imatinib resistance among CML patients. Methods and results Samples from 175 Philadelphia positive CML patients (83 good response and 92 BCR-ABL non-mutated imatinib resistant patients) were subjected to Methylation Specific High Resolution Melt Analysis for methylation levels quantification of the HOXA4 and HOXA5 promoter regions. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was done to elucidate the optimal methylation cut-off point followed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Log-Rank analysis was done to measure the overall survival difference between CML groups. The optimal methylation cut-off point was found to be at 62.5% for both HOXA4 and HOXA5. Chronic myeloid leukemia patients with ≥63% HOXA4 and HOXA5 methylation level were shown to have 3.78 and 3.95 times the odds, respectively, to acquire resistance to imatinib. However, overall survival of CML patients that have ≤62% and ≥ 63% methylation levels of HOXA4 and HOXA5 genes were found to be not significant (P-value = 0.126 for HOXA4; P-value = 0.217 for HOXA5). Conclusion Hypermethylation of the HOXA4 and HOXA5 promoter is correlated with imatinib resistance and with further investigation, it could be a potential epigenetic biomarker in supplement to the BCR-ABL gene mutation in predicting imatinib treatment response among CML patients but could not be considered as a prognostic marker.

Development of resistance to imatinib mesylate (IM) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients is mediated by different mechanisms that can be classified as BCR-ABL dependent or BCR-ABL independent pathways. BCR-ABL dependent mechanisms are most frequently associated with point mutations in tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) of BCR-ABL1 and also with BCR-ABL gene amplification. Many different types and frequencies of mutations have been reported in different studies, probably due to the different composition of study cohorts. Since no reports are available from Malaysia, this study was undertaken to investigate the frequency and pattern of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations using dHPLC followed by sequencing, and also status of BCR-ABL gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on 40 IM resistant Malaysian CML patients. Mutations were detected in 13 patients (32.5%). Five different types of mutations (T315I, E255K, Y253H, M351T, V289F) were identified in these patients. In the remaining 27 IM resistant CML patients, we investigated the contribution made by BCR-ABL gene amplification, but none of these patients showed amplification. It is presumed that the mechanisms of resistance in these 27 patients might be due to BCR-ABL independent pathways. Different mutations confer different levels of resistance and, therefore, detection and characterization of TKD mutations is highly important in order to guide therapy in CML patients.

Background: Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is the most prevalent inherited cause of mental retardation. The prevalence of FXS in males and females are approximately 1 in 4000 and 1 in 8000 respectively. It is caused by CGG repeat instability in the FMR1 gene, located on chromosome Xq27.3. Normal individuals have CGG repeats ranging from 5 to 53. In premutation carriers, the CGG repeats range from 60 to 200 and shall be more than 200 repeats for full mutation patients. FXS patients have variable clinical features and because of that, an accurate clinical diagnosis is always a problem. Currently, Cytogenetic, PCR and Southern Blot Techniques are widely used for diagnosis of FXS. Case Report: Here we report a pair of brothers suspected to be FXS patients with similar clinical features. However, the cytogenetic result for younger brother did not show fragile site at Xq27.3 of the X chromosome while molecular result was confirmatory for FXS. Conversely, the elder brother showed confirmatory results for Fragile X mutation in both cytogenetic and molecular analysis. Conclusion: We therefore conclude that patient 1 confirms for Fragile X mosaic and patient 2 for Fragile X full mutation. From the result, cytogenetic analysis alone cannot be dependable for the confirmatory diagnosis of FXS.

Development of resistance to imatinib mesylate (IM) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients has emerged as a significant clinical problem. The observation that increased epigenetic silencing of potential tumor suppressor genes correlates with disease progression in some CML patients treated with IM suggests a relationship between epigenetic silencing and resistance development. We hypothesize that promoter hypermethylation of HOXA4 could be an epigenetic mechanism mediating IM resistance in CML patients. Thus a study was undertaken to investigate the promoter hypermethylation status of HOXA4 in CML patients on IM treatment and to determine its role in mediating resistance to IM. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples of 95 CML patients (38 good responders and 57 resistant) and 12 normal controls. All samples were bisulfite treated and analysed by methylation-specific high-resolution melt analysis. Compared to the good responders, the HOXA4 hypermethylation level was significantly higher (P = 0.002) in IM-resistant CML patients. On comparing the risk, HOXA4 hypermethylation was associated with a higher risk for IM resistance (OR 4.658; 95% CI, 1.673-12.971; P = 0.003). Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that promoter hypermethylation of HOXA4 gene could be an epigenetic mechanism mediating IM resistance in CML patients.

Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is the most common form of inherited mental retardation in men. It is caused by abnormalities in the FMR1 gene that are associated with CGG repeat expansion and the hypermethylation status of its promoter. Methylated alleles lead to transcriptional inhibition and consequent loss of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein. Chemical modification of cytosine to uracil by bisulfite treatment has proved to be an attractive method for DNA methylation studies that precludes labor-intensive Southern blot analysis, which is the gold standard test for FXS. In this report, bisulfite-treated DNA samples were amplified using real-time multiplex methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction followed by melting curve analysis. Our results show that all control samples with known CGG repeat numbers and methylation statuses were correctly diagnosed. The samples from 43 male patients were also successfully diagnosed, which were in complete agreement with the results of Southern blotting. By such means, 39 patients were found to have an unmethylated allele; 3, a fully mutated allele; and 1, both methylated and unmethylated alleles, thus implying a diagnosis of mosaicism. In conclusion, we find our method to be convenient for screening a large number of male patients with FXS, because it is rapid and easy to perform, especially when there is a low quantity of DNA that must be sensitively and accurately assayed.