Traditional insurance’s earthquake contingency costs are insufficient for earthquake funding due to extreme differences from actual losses. The earthquake bond (EB) links insurance to capital market bonds, enabling higher and more sustainable earthquake funding, but challenges persist in pricing EBs. This paper presents zero-coupon and coupon-paying EB pricing models involving the inconstant event intensity and maximum strength of extreme earthquakes under the risk-neutral pricing measure. Focusing on extreme earthquakes simplifies the modeling and data processing time compared to considering infinite earthquake frequency occurring over a continuous time interval. The intensity is accommodated using the inhomogeneous Poisson process, while the maximum strength is modeled using extreme value theory (EVT). Furthermore, we conducted model experiments and variable sensitivity analyses on EB prices using earthquake data from Indonesia’s National Disaster Management Authority from 2008 to 2021. The sensitivity analysis results show that choosing inconstant intensity rather than a constant one implies significant EB price differences, and the maximum strength distribution based on EVT matches the data distribution. The presented model and its experiments can guide EB issuers in setting EB prices. Then, the variable sensitivities to EB prices can be used by investors to choose EB according to their risk tolerance.

Losses experienced by the Indonesian government due to floods are predicted. It is because of the significance of population growth, closure of water catchment areas, and climate change in many regions in Indonesia. The government has tried to reduce the risk but faces insufficient funds. Therefore, new innovative funding sources are essential to overcome these limitations. One way to obtain it is through issuing Flood Catastrophe Bonds (FCB). Unfortunately, Indonesia has had no FCB price estimate until now. On the basis of this problem, this study aims to estimate the FCB price in Indonesia. The primary method used is the approximation method of the aggregate loss distribution. This method can compute the aggregate flood loss cumulative distribution function value faster. The FCB fair price estimation results are cheap because the risk of the instrument is significant. This significant risk is also proportional to the large return. Finally, further analysis shows that in Indonesia, the attachment point of the FCB has a relationship that is in line with the price, while the term of FCB does not. This research is expected to assist the Indonesian government in determining the fair price of FCB in Indonesia. This research can assist the investors in choosing FCB based on expected return, attachment point, and the term they want.

Earthquake contingency costs in traditional insurance cannot provide sufficient earthquake funding for a country because they often differ significantly from actual losses. Over the last three decades, this approach has been replaced by linking earthquake insurance to bonds in the capital market; this is now known as the earthquake catastrophe bond (ECB). Through the ECB, contingency costs become larger and more sustainable earthquake funds. Unfortunately, there are challenges in ECB issuance, as the pricing framework does not yet have standard rules and still needs to be studied. Therefore, the objective of this study is to systematically review how the ECB pricing framework is designed. The method used in this review is PRISMA. First, articles aiming to design an ECB pricing framework were collected from the Scopus, Science Direct, and Dimensions databases on 22 March 2023. Then, the results were selected, resulting in eleven relevant articles. Then, the articles’ pricing frameworks were reviewed based on variables, methods, trigger events, coupon and redemption value payment schemes, and the model solution forms. Finally, several research opportunities for academics are also outlined. This research constitutes a reference for ECB issuers during the pricing process and can motivate academics to design more useful ECB pricing models.

The issuance of multiple-event catastrophe bonds (MECBs) has the potential to increase in the next few years. This is due to the increasing trend in the frequency of global catastrophes, which makes single-event catastrophe bonds (SECBs) less relevant. However, there are obstacles to issuing MECBs since the pricing framework is still little studied. Therefore, this study aims to develop such a new pricing framework. The model uniquely involves three new variables: the trigger event correlation, interest, and inflation rates. The trigger event correlation rate was accommodated by the involvement of the copula while the interest and inflation rates were simultaneously considered using an integrated autoregressive vector stochastic model. After the model was obtained, the model was simulated on storm catastrophe data in the United States. Finally, the effect of the three variables on MECB prices was also analyzed. The analysis results show that the three variables make MECB prices more fairly than other models. This research is expected to guide special purpose vehicles to set fairer MECB prices and can also be used as a reference for investors in choosing MECBs based on the rates of trigger event correlation and the real interest they can expect.