Speaking about the ruling on working with weak hadiths in virtues and provisions remains one of the issues raised in the scientific and advocacy arena. It has views differed surprisingly, so we see many preachers and students of science narrate any hadith has come and went because they are not aware of the sayings of scholars in this serious subject without corroborating the validity of what is being told, on the pretext that the weak hadith is desirable to work in the virtues without distinguishing betweenthe weak and Abandoned and even Forged Hadith, and in return, find some people attributed to the science to prevent the work of the weak conversation at all, without distinction also between the weak and the easy little between the severe and the weak, and even considered it as the topic completely, and therefore the importance of this research is represented in our endeavor to gather the parties to the issue, and liberate a place Conflict and clarification of what is right, aiming to do so to shed more light on the necessity of reviving the Sunnah, taking into account its true and good narrations, as long as it can. The research in delivering its proposal follows the analytical inductive approach by tracing the texts of scholars specializing in this field and mentioning their sayings, directions and guides, and deciding what is most likely to be explained by evidence. In the result, the research will reach the assertion of the perfection and beauty of this religion in its legislation and highlighting the reserves of its scholars in order to preserve its purity and serenity away from extremism and leniency. The research consists of an introduction, three topics, and a conclusion