Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Statistics
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Thesis and Dissertation
  3. PhD Dissertations
  4. الحصانة التنفيذية للدولة في ظل اتفاقية الأمم المتحدة لحصانات الدول وممتلكاتها من الولاية القضائية: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة
 
  • Details
Options

الحصانة التنفيذية للدولة في ظل اتفاقية الأمم المتحدة لحصانات الدول وممتلكاتها من الولاية القضائية: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

Date Issued
2019-11
Author(s)
سالم فرىود عناد الجنابي
Salim Farhood Enad Al-Janabi
Abstract
There is no doubt that executing foreign verdicts is no more than satisfactory or compulsory. If satisfactory execution does not raise any problems for the person who has a valid verdict, it follows that the compulsory execution requires a massive effort from that person to execute the verdict. It is also no doubt that executing against the state is unlike that upon a normal person. This is because the state holds immunity against executive procedures through which the problem of the current research arises. The use of this impunity by the state blocks the compulsory execution if it refrains from the satisfactory execution. This use of impunity by the state creates a difficulty which we can potentially refer to as " floating verdicts". These verdicts have no legal value if they do not have other means to be executed. In this thesis, the researcher aims at identifying the executing immunity of the state and identify the state's finances and actions covered by this immunity and finding a solution to execute these verdicts. The analytical and comparative methods are used in this research to analyze the legal tenets of united nations' conventions related to the immunity of the states and comparing it with other national laws and judicial practices for the states under study. The findings of the study revealed that executing immunity is governed by the nature of the state's actions. In other words, this immunity is ruled by the state's finance and actions which have a sovereignty nature. Accordingly, it is possible for the person who has a valid verdict to execute the verdict on non-sovereign properties and finances belonging to the state. Second, there is also another means of executing which is called "diplomatic protection for the state upon its dependents". Finally, the significance of the research resides in finding out solutions which mitigate the sharpness of the state's immunity and contributes to executing verdicts.
Subjects

Foreign Verdicts

State Immunity

Immunity Execution

Welcome to SRP

"A platform where you can access full-text research
papers, journal articles, conference papers, book
chapters, and theses by USIM researchers and students.”

Contact:
  • ddms@usim.edu.my
  • 06-798 6206 / 6221
  • USIM Library
Follow Us:
READ MORE Copyright © 2024 Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia