Publication:
Why Should PLS-SEM Be Used Rather Than Regression? Evidence from the Capital Structure Perspective

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRamli, NAen_US
dc.contributor.authorLatan, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorNartea, GVen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-29T02:58:57Z
dc.date.available2024-05-29T02:58:57Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis study examines capital structure determinants using a simultaneous causal model with interaction effects between manifest and latent variables. Partial Least Squares (PLS) is an approach to Structural Equation Models (SEM) that allows researchers to analyse the relationships simultaneously. It is interesting to compare and contrast this approach in analysing mediation relationships with the regression analysis, In addition to statistical data, logical arguments are presented supported by two case studies from PLS-SEM and regression models. We find that the choice between regression and PLS-SEM matters even with the simplest scenarios per item for constructs. This study's originality is the provision of new comparative analyses of PLS-SEM versus regression analysis in the context of capital structure determinants. The "indirect" and "mediate" macro syntax normal theory of the Sobel test, and the bootstrapping techniques are compared with PLS-SEM. We Lind that the PLS-SEM analysis provides less contradictory results than regression analysis in terms of detecting mediation effects,en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study examines capital structure determinants using a simultaneous causal model with interaction effects between manifest and latent variables. Partial Least Squares (PLS) is an approach to Structural Equation Models (SEM) that allows researchers to analyse the relationships simultaneously. It is interesting to compare and contrast this approach in analysing mediation relationships with the regression analysis, In addition to statistical data, logical arguments are presented supported by two case studies from PLS-SEM and regression models. We find that the choice between regression and PLS-SEM matters even with the simplest scenarios per item for constructs. This study's originality is the provision of new comparative analyses of PLS-SEM versus regression analysis in the context of capital structure determinants. The "indirect" and "mediate" macro syntax normal theory of the Sobel test, and the bootstrapping techniques are compared with PLS-SEM. We Lind that the PLS-SEM analysis provides less contradictory results than regression analysis in terms of detecting mediation effects,
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-71691-6_6
dc.identifier.epage209
dc.identifier.isbn2214-7934
dc.identifier.issn0884-8289
dc.identifier.scopusWOS:000437127000007
dc.identifier.spage171
dc.identifier.urihttps://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/11716
dc.identifier.volume267
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofPartial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Recent Advances In Banking And Finance
dc.sourceWeb Of Science (ISI)
dc.subjectCapital Structureen_US
dc.subjectFinn Performanceen_US
dc.subjectPLS-SEMen_US
dc.titleWhy Should PLS-SEM Be Used Rather Than Regression? Evidence from the Capital Structure Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections

Web of Science_WoS