Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
    Communities & Collections
    Research Outputs
    Fundings & Projects
    People
    Statistics
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Thesis and Dissertation
  3. PhD Dissertations
  4. Indirect Expropriation And Compensation In International Investment Law, Jordanian Law And Islamic Law Perspectives
 
  • Details
Options

Indirect Expropriation And Compensation In International Investment Law, Jordanian Law And Islamic Law Perspectives

Date Issued
2022-11
Author(s)
Abd Alhade Mossa Hasan Rshdan
Abstract
Indirect expropriation has proven to be a complex area of debate in international investment law. The disputes arising from indirect expropriation stem from the fact that most of the bilateral and multilateral investment treaties do not include specific articles and sufficient guidance to regulate and compensate for indirect expropriation. As a result, the arbitral tribunals are given wide discretion in terms of interpreting and determining the scope of indirect expropriation and the consequential compensation. This has resulted in inconsistent awards which lack a sense of interpretative direction for investors in protecting their investments and host states in defining and exerting their regulatory space. The aim of this thesis is to develop a doctrinal understanding of indirect expropriation and the criteria for the determination of compensation based on the jurisprudence of arbitral decisions, the texts of bilateral and multilateral investment treaties and scholarly discussions in the field, from the perspectives of international investment law, Jordanian Law and Islamic Law. This qualitative study is conducted from a balanced point of view between competing interests of host countries and foreign investors. Findings of this research confirm the existence of ambiguity and inconsistency in the determination of indirect expropriation and its compensation under international investment law and highlights the emerging approaches in the interpretation thereof. This thesis also draws insights from the principles of Islamic law to arrive at a holistic understanding of international investment obligation, which recognizes private ownership of investors, the collective responsibilities and the host state’s role in the spheres of public interest and social justice. Consequently, this study sets out and clarifies the necessary criteria for indirect expropriation and compensation, and further suggests a model clause for the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan to apply in relation thereto, in future bilateral or multilateral investment treaties.
Subjects

International commerc...

Investments, Foreign-...

Indirect expropriatio...

File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

4150227 Declaration..pdf

Size

249.8 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):26261784432c4e314f3eaafbbc19c7e6

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

4150227 Introduction.pdf

Size

2.27 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):c82585b2b3d9bc975253ce964ff14e7c

Welcome to SRP

"A platform where you can access full-text research
papers, journal articles, conference papers, book
chapters, and theses by USIM researchers and students.”

Contact:
  • ddms@usim.edu.my
  • 06-798 6206 / 6221
  • USIM Library
Follow Us:
READ MORE Copyright © 2024 Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia