Publication:
A Comparative Legal Study Between Malaysia and Australia Biosecurity Law

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNurfarhah Farhanim Binti Shafieen_US
dc.contributor.authorNoor Dzuhaidah Binti Osmanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-30T03:33:55Z
dc.date.available2024-05-30T03:33:55Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionE-Proceeding Postgraduate Research Conference (PRC2023) : “Sustainable Education & Human Well-Being”/ editors: Roslee Ahmad , Khadijah Muda, Md Yousuf Ali, Ihab Ahmed Ra’uf Awais, Abdul Rashid Abdul Aziz, Ainul Mardhiah Mokhtar, Nurun Najihah Musa, Puteri Nazirah Amran, Fatin Muti’ah Mohamed Ishak Organized by: Faculty of Leadership and Managementen_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the differences of law and institutional framework between Malaysia and Australia. The current legislation dealing with the threat and diseases in relation to Covid-19 is still based on the outdated, static legislation. The new legislation amendment should be created and controlled by a specific authority solely in order to address this problem. Malaysia needs to consult the organisations that cover all damages. In order to examine and put into practise new laws from diverse regulatory strategies with the intention of protecting living things, the regulatory theory is employed as the theoretical framework. Despite Australia's decision to not join the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, the protocol is widely used because it serves as the cornerstone for biosafety. At the conclusion of the legal comparative analysis, it is suggested that Malaysia's current law needs to be improved for better governance. This is done by comparing the similarities and differences between the legal and institutional biosafety laws of the two countries. The findings of the thesis more focus on the similarities and the differences between Malaysia and Australia Biosecurity laws. The study concludes that the implementation and improvement of the new law can be made by following the right approach.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNurfarhah Farhanim Shafie, & Noor Dzuhaidah Osman. (2024). A Comparative Legal Study Between Malaysia and Australia Biosecurity Law. E-Proceeding Postgraduate Research Conference , 153–155. https://fkp.usim.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/LATEST-PROCEEDING-PRC-2023_compressed.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.epage155
dc.identifier.isbn978-629-7636-27-6
dc.identifier.spage153
dc.identifier.urihttps://fkp.usim.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/LATEST-PROCEEDING-PRC-2023_compressed.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/16352
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Leadership and Managementen_US
dc.relation.conferencePostgraduate Research Conference (PRC2023)en_US
dc.subjectBiosecurity; Biosafety; Covid-19; Cartagena Protocolen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Legal Study Between Malaysia and Australia Biosecurity Lawen_US
dc.title.alternativeKajian Perbandingan Undang-Undang Antara Undang-Undang Biosekuriti Malaysia dan Australiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A Comparative Legal Study Between Malaysia and Australia Biosecurity Law.pdf
Size:
61.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

2023 PRC