Publication:
Kritikan Terhadap Hipotesis Pengeksplisitan: Penelitian Hipotesis Blum-Kulka Dalam Terjemahan

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMukhlis Roslien_US
dc.contributor.authorNasimah Abdullahen_US
dc.contributor.authorLubna Binti Abd Rahmanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-27T14:34:22Z
dc.date.available2024-05-27T14:34:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-10-28
dc.description.abstractExplicitation like any other field in translation studies has its own level of development. The explicitation was first introduced indirectly by Vinay & Darbelnet which was later developed into a systematic study by Blum-Kulka through observations on the level of cohesion in the translated text. Blum-Kulka has proposed an explicitation hypothesis that assumes that the process of interpretations might lead to a target text which is more redundant than the source text regardless of the increase traceable to differences between the two linguistic and textual systems involved. This hypothesis appears to have a significant impact on the domain of explicitation. However, Blum-Kulka's study especially her hypothesis has received a lot of support and questions. Several scholars have approached the matter directly and have various points of view in this regard. In order to present a thorough finding on the problems of this hypothesis, the research aims to conduct a comprehensive research of the critique of the Blum-Kulka explicitation hypothesis. The study focused on descriptive analysis with concentrating on the explicitation hypothesis Blum-Kulka and other related studies. The research process and the critical analysis of views will be drawn to the conclusion of the study. The overall findings of the discussion showed that the Blum-Kulka explicitation hypothesis was exposed to three serious shortcomings. Even so, this hypothesis has an undeniable part in shaping and enhancing the discourse of explicitation these days.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRosli, M., Abdullah , N., & Abd Rahman , L. (2021). Kritikan terhadap hipotesis pengeksplisitan: Penelitian hipotesis Blum-Kulka dalam terjemahan [Criticism of the explicitation hypothesis: observations on Blum-Kulka’s hypothesis in translation]. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/126en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33306/mjssh/126
dc.identifier.epage136
dc.identifier.issn2590-3691
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.other425-33
dc.identifier.spage126
dc.identifier.urihttps://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/3180
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.publisherPersatuan Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan Muallimen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMuallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH online)en_US
dc.subjectExplicitation, Explicitation Hypothesis, Blum-Kulka, Process of the Explicitation, Translation-Inherenten_US
dc.titleKritikan Terhadap Hipotesis Pengeksplisitan: Penelitian Hipotesis Blum-Kulka Dalam Terjemahanen_US
dc.title.alternativeCritism of the Explicitation Hypothesis: Observations on Blum-Kulka's Hypothesis in Translationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
208. Kritikan Terhadap Hipotesis Pengeksplisitan-Penelitian Hipotesis Blum-kulka Dalam Terjemahan.pdf
Size:
432.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Other Publications