Publication:
The matan and sanad criticisms in evaluating the hadith

Simple item page
dc.citedby1
dc.contributor.affiliationsKolej Islam Antarabangsa Sultan Ismail Petra (KIAS) Kelantan
dc.contributor.affiliationsUniversiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA)
dc.contributor.affiliationsUniversiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM)
dc.contributor.authorIsmail T.M.S.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaru R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHassan A.F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSalleh A.Z.B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAmin M.F.M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-28T08:39:47Z
dc.date.available2024-05-28T08:39:47Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractKnowledge on the classification (mustalah) and sciences (ulum) of the al-Hadith that has long existed is the platform for religious scholars to debate the preservation and safeguarding of the originality and authenticity of the Prophet’s SAW hadith. The topic is to determine whether to accept or reject the circumstances surrounding the chain of narrators (sanad) and the text of the hadith (matan). The evaluation of a hadith is made based on the sanad and matan criticisms. What is the relationship between these two aspects and to what degree does the role and significance of these two aspects affect the evaluation of a hadith, notwithstanding the criteria needed by parties that intend to evaluate the hadith? Hence, these are some of the questions that reflect the issues in this article. This brief study on the writings by experts in the field has produced a few latent points that can be summarised as; the criticisms of the sanad and matan had begun since the time of the Prophet’s SAW companions although criticisms on the matan took preference and dominance due to the need at that moment in time. In the context of evaluating the hadith, both these aspects need to be jointly criticized and not in a separate context. At times, the hadith might have been authenticated based on the sanad, nevertheless criticism of the matan would still be initiated to ascertain that the text of the hadith is safe from contradictory facts or void of any hidden flaws.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5539/ass.v10n21p152
dc.identifier.epage158
dc.identifier.issn19112017
dc.identifier.issue21
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84908345769
dc.identifier.spage152
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84908345769&doi=10.5539%2fass.v10n21p152&partnerID=40&md5=07977f1244ea7d0d46fd6cf78d714384
dc.identifier.urihttps://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/9249
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Center of Science and Educationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Accessen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Social Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEvaluating the hadithen_US
dc.subjectHadith scholaren_US
dc.subjectMatan criticismen_US
dc.subjectSanad criticismen_US
dc.titleThe matan and sanad criticisms in evaluating the hadithen_US
dc.title.alternativeAsian Soc. Sci.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The matan and sanad criticisms in evaluating the hadith.pdf
Size:
172.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Scopus