Options
Assessment Tools To Measure Postnatal Mental \r\nIllness: A 10-year Scoping Review
Journal
Malaysian Family Physician
Date Issued
2022
Author(s)
Nur Liyana Shahmi Ruslan
Siti Roshaidai Mohd Arifin
Khadijah Hasanah Abang Abdullah
Nurul Ain Hidayah Abas
Rohayah Husain
Karimah Hanim Abd Aziz
Ramli Musa
Fathima Begum Syed Mohideen
Asma Perveen
Fathima Begum Syed Mohideen
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51866/rv1289
Abstract
Introduction: The use of assessment tools to measure postnatal mental illness is essential in healthcare settings. However, variations in the types of tools and their reliability in a particular population lead to under-recognition of mental health status in postnatal mothers. The aim of this review is to evaluate the most recent 10 year of research on the validity and reliability of postnatal mental illness assessment tools.
Methods: A literature search of studies from online databases PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct was conducted.
Results: A total of 59 studies were selected for this review. Several studies utilised multiple assessment tools, and a total of 96 assessment tools were identified and classified into six domains: postnatal blues, postnatal stress, postnatal anxiety, postnatal depression, postnatal psychosis, and postnatal psychological disorder. In this review, EPDS was the most common tool used to identify postnatal depression and anxiety while DASS 21 was the most common tool used to identify postnatal psychological disorder. There is a wide range in preponderance of evidence for the reliability of each assessment tool and there were inconsistencies in assessing the validity of the assessment tools.
Conclusion: This review provides information regarding some of the main assessment tools currently available to measure postnatal mental illnesses. There were no standardised tools that were used in a particular setting. The results may differ in different population because there are differences in not only languages and dialects, but also cultural and racial backgrounds, which greatly influences their perception and interpretation of postnatal mental illness.
Methods: A literature search of studies from online databases PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct was conducted.
Results: A total of 59 studies were selected for this review. Several studies utilised multiple assessment tools, and a total of 96 assessment tools were identified and classified into six domains: postnatal blues, postnatal stress, postnatal anxiety, postnatal depression, postnatal psychosis, and postnatal psychological disorder. In this review, EPDS was the most common tool used to identify postnatal depression and anxiety while DASS 21 was the most common tool used to identify postnatal psychological disorder. There is a wide range in preponderance of evidence for the reliability of each assessment tool and there were inconsistencies in assessing the validity of the assessment tools.
Conclusion: This review provides information regarding some of the main assessment tools currently available to measure postnatal mental illnesses. There were no standardised tools that were used in a particular setting. The results may differ in different population because there are differences in not only languages and dialects, but also cultural and racial backgrounds, which greatly influences their perception and interpretation of postnatal mental illness.
File(s)
Loading...
Name
Assessment tools to measure postnatal mental illness_ A 10 year scoping review.pdf
Size
148.34 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):113cc3e58fa3d261143200ab79d23778