196 
REFERENCES 
Abbad, M. M., Morris, D., AI-Ayyoub, A., & Abbad, J. M. (2009). E-learning: AOU 
Studcnts* Acceptance of Technology. In The 41h Internatioiltil coil 
Interactive Mobile and Computer Aided Learning, Amman, Jordan. 
Abu-al-aish. A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors Influencing Students' Acceptance of M- 
Learning: An Investigation in Higher Education. The Iflteriiational Review of 
Research 111 Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 83-108. 
Agarwal, R., & Prasa, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal 
innovativeness in the domain of information technology, Ltformatrojt Systeirrs 
Research, 9(2), 204-301. doi: 10.1287/isre. 9.2.204. 
Ajzen. I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & 
1. Beckmann (Eds. ), Springer series in social psychology. Berlin: Springer 
Ajzen, 1. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Orgarri_crtionnl Behavior and Human 
Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. 
Ajzen, l., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Undeitanding Attitude and Predicting Social 13chcwior. 
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 
Akour, H. (2009). Determinants of mobile learning acceptance: An empirical 
investigation in higher education. PhD Thesis. Oklahoma State University, US. 
Aksornsingchai, P., & Srinilta, C. (2011). Statistical Downscaling for Rainfall and 
Temperature Prediction in Thailand. In Proceedings of the Interwational Multi 
Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. (pp. 356-361). Hong Kong. 
Alalwan, N., Ahmed Alzahrani, and Mohamed Sarrab. (2013). "M-Learning the Next 
Generation of Education in Cyberspace. " 
Al-Amman, J., & Hamad, S. (2008, April). Factors influencing the adoption of e-learning 
at UOB. In Proceecling of the 
Second International Conn/ rence and Exhibition for 
Zain E-learning Center, ivlanama, Bahrain (pp. 28-30). 
Alamsyah, A., and Gadang Ramantoko. (2011). "Implementations of M-Learning in 
Higher Education in Indonesia. ßcrclung: 7elkonr Institrrle (? /Mairrrgenrent. 
197 
Alatalo, T., & Siponen, M. (2002). Addressing the Personalization Paradox in the 
Development of Electronic Commerce Systems., In Post-Proceedings o/ the E- 
Business Research Forum (eBRF). (pp. 1-13). 7ampere, Finland. 
Alexander. B. (2004). M-Learning: Emerging Pedagogical and Campus Issues in the 
Mobile Learning Environment. EDUCAUSE_ Center for Applied Research (ECAR) 
Bulletin, 2004(16), 25-35. 
Al-Gahtani, S. S., Hubona, G. S., & Wang, J. (? 007). Information technology (IT) in 
Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT. Lifarmation c& 
Alanagc'ntcnt, 44(8), 681-691. 
Al-Khaldi, M. A., & Wallace, R. S. 0. (1999). The influence of attitudes on personal 
computer utilization among knowledge workers: the case of Saudi Arabia. 
Information and Aianugeiuent, 36(4), 185-204. 
Ally. M., and Avgoustos Tsinakos. (2014). "Perspectives on Open and Distance Learning: 
Increasing Access through Mobile Learning. 
AI-matari. A. Y., lahad, N. A.. & Balaid, A. S. (201 33). Factors influencing students' 
intention to use mlearnin, 11.. lournul o/' In%ornurtion Srslcnns Research and 
Innovation (JISRII), 5. 
Al-Mushasha, N. F., & Hasan, S. (2007, November 20-2 1). A Study on the Perception of 
Students towards Mobile Learning Services in University Environment. Paper 
presented at the Rural ICT Development Conference '07 (RICTD '07), Executive 
Development Centre (EDC), Sintok, Malaysia. 
Al-Mushasha, N. F., & Hassan, S. (2009). A Model for Mobile Learning Service Quality 
in University Environment. International Journal of Mobile Computing and 
. Iultinn'cliu Cwnniunications, l (l), 70-91. 
Al-Mushasha, N. F., & Hassan, S. (2009). A Model for Mobile Learning Service Quality 
in University Environment. hltcrnational Journal Of Mobile Computing and 
; 11111ti/11CCliCI 
ommunications, I (l), 70-91. 
AL-QASA, K. H. A. L. L. D., ISA, F. M., &, OTI-iMAN, S. N. (2013). Factors Affecting 
Intentions to Use Banking Services in Yenien. Journal (y'lntcnjc, j Banking and 
Ccmnncrcc, 18(3). 
198 
Al-Quclah, O. M., & Kamsuriah Ahmad. (2014). Cultural Technology Acceptance Model 
for Consumers" Acceptance of Arabic E-Commerce Websites. Engineering and 
7echnolo w 7(8): 1623-1633. 
Alrasheedi, M., K Capretz, L. F. (2015). Determination of Critical Success Factors 
Affecting Mobile Learning: A Meta-Analysis Approach. TOJET: The Turkish Online 
Journal of Lchecational Technology, 14(2). 
Altman, G.. Stiff, R. (1973). Theory of Diffusion. In S. W T. S. Robertson 
Consumer Behavior: Theoretical Sources (pp. 416-468). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 
Prentice-Hall. 
Alzaza, N. S., & Yaakub, A. R. (201 1). Students' awareness and requirements of mobile 
learning services in the higher education environment. American Journal o/ 
Economics cmd Business Achutinistrution, 3(l), 95-100. 
Alzaza, N. S., and Abdul Razak Yaakub. "Conference. (2010). Student's Mobile 
Information Prototype (SMIP) for the Higher Education Environment. " 
Proceed ngs kllon'ICCI,,, e ! manage/Nen/ flfl/l inter nato, ial "COlif8re! ICe. 
Al-Zoubi, A. Y.. Jeschke, S.. & Pfeiffer, O. (2010). Mobile Learning in Engineering 
Education: The Jordan Example. In International Con/rrence on 1: -Learning in the 
Workplace. 
Anderson, P., & Blackwood, A. (2004). Mobile and PDA technologies and their future 
use in education. DISC "Technology and Standards Watch, 4(3), 3-33. 
Anderson, T. (2005). Distance learning-Social software's killer ap. Proceedings (#'I/lc 
Open & Distance Learning Association (? f'1 ustru/ia: Adelaide: ODLAA. Retrieved 
Juh', 31,2006. 
Arif; A., Yasi, N., Radzi, M., Husin, S., & Embi, M. A. (2013). The Influence of 
Demographics on Mobile Learning Readiness: Science versus Social Science 
Undergraduates. In Embi, M. A. & Nordin, N. M. (Eds), Mobile learning: 
Malaysian initiatives and research findings. Malaysia: Centre for Academic 
Advancement, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 
Arif -in, S. A. (2011). Mobile learning in the institution of higher learning for Malaysia 
students: Culture perspectives. Inte171ati(Inal J0u11711al 011 Adi"anccd Science, 
E11gi11ceI711 and I11'01711Citi011 Technolo-, 1(3), 283-288. 
199 
AriCfin. S. A., & Dyson, L. E. (2012). Student perspectives on mLearning for local 
cultural studies in Malaysia. Student Perspectives on MLe urning for Local Cultural 
Studies in Muluvsiu. Proceedings Cultural Attitudes Toirurds Technology and 
Conmrunicution. 
Assibey. (2015). what drives behavioral intention of mobile money adoption? The case of 
Ancient Susu Saving Operations in Ghana. International Journal o/'Social 
Economics, 42(1 1). 
Attewell, J. (2004). Mobile technologies and learning. A technology update and in- 
learning project summary, London: Learning and Skills Development Agency. 
Attewell. J. (2005a). From research and development to mobile learning: Tools for 
education and training providers and their learners. Paper presented at the 4th 
1Vorld Cotrfýrence on inLcuriring, Cupe Town, South Africa. 
Attewell, . 
1. (2005b). Mobile learning: reaching hard-to-reach learners and bridging the 
digital divide. In G. Chiazzese, M. Allegra, A. Chifari & S. Ottaviano (Eds. ), 
Methods and Technologies %or Learning (pp. 361 365). 
Attewell, . 
1., & Savill-Smith, C. (2003). Mobile learning and social inclusion: focusing on 
learners and learning. In Proceedings of MLEARN 2003: Learning with mobile 
devices. London: Learning und Skills Development Agency (pp. 3-12). 
Azam, M. S., & Quaddus, M. (2012). Effects of internal and external factors on internet- 
based digital technology usage by SMEs in a developing country. Communications 
of'the IIMA, 12(4), 41. 
Azizan, F. Z. (2010). Blended learning in higher education institution in Malaysia. 
in Proceedings gfRegional Conference on Knowledge Integration in ICT (pp. 454- 
466). 
Bagchi, K., Cerveny, R., Hart, P., & Peterson, M. (2003). The influence of national 
culture in information technology product adoption. In Proceedings of the Ninth 
Americas Con/erence on Information Systems. (pp. 957-965). USA. 
Baran, E. (2014). A Review of Research on Mobile Learning in Teacher 
Education. Jowl ul of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4). 
Barker, A., Krull, G., & Mallinson, B. (2005, October). A proposed theoretical model for 
m-learning adoption in developing countries. In Proceedim s of mLeurn (Vol. 
2005, p. 4th). 
200 
Bartel, S.. & Meerts, J. (2002). Overview of next generation wireless data [Electronic 
Version]. Retrieved November 10,2010, from http: 
//www. educause. edu/ir/library/pdf/DEC0204. pdf. 
Bebko, C. P. (2000). Service intangibility and its impact on consumer expectations of 
service quality. Journal of'Services Marketing, 14(1), 9-26. 
Becking, D., Betermieux, S., Bomsdorf, B., Feldmann, B., Heuel, E., Langer, P., & 
Schlageter, G. (2005). How to match mobile learning resources with learners 
current needs: The didactic profiling. Proc. HC112005,144. 
Becta. (2004). What the Research Says about Portable ICT Devices in Teaching and 
Learning (2nd cd). Coventry, UK: Becta ICT Research. 
Behera, Santosh Kumar. (2013). "E-and M-Learning: A comparative study. " International 
Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 4.3 
Belanger. Y. (2005). Duke University iPod First Year Experience Final Evaluation 
Report. Retrieved April, 4,2009 from littp: //cit. duke. edu/pdf/ ipod --initiative 
_04_05.1)d 
f. 
Bless. C., & Higson, C. (1995). Fundamentals of social research methods: An African 
perspective (2nd ed. ). Lusaka: Juta and Co. 
Boggs, R. (2002). ECAR study: Trends in wireless communications in higher education 
[Electronic Version]. Retrieved November 20,2009, from https: 
//www. educause. edu/ir/library/pdf/EDUO218. pdf 
Brown. I. T. J. (2002). Individual and technological factors affecting PEOU and web- 
based learning technologies in a developing country. Electronic Journal in 
Information Svvteni in Developing Countries, 9(5), 1-15. 
Bryan, A. (2004). Going nomadic: Mobile learning in higher education. Ethicause 
Revielr, 39(5), 28-35. 
Calantone, R. J., Griffith, D. A., & Yalcinkaya, G. (2006). An empirical examination of a 
technology adoption model for the context of China. Journal of International 
[Marketing, 14(4), 1-27. 
Carlsson, C.. Carlsson, J., Hyvonen, K., Puhakainen, J., & Walden, P. (2006, January). 
Adoption of mobile devices/services-searching for answers with the UTAUT. 
201 
In System Sciences, 2006. HICSS'06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hnu"aü 
International Conference on (Vol. 6, pp. 132a-I32a). IEEE. 
Carlsson, C., 1-lyvonen, K., Repo, P., & Walden, P. (2005, January). Asynchronous 
adoption patterns of mobile services. In System Sciences, 2005. IIICSS'05. 
Proce8(1117gs O/ the 381h Annual Hawaii International COI? / reilce on (pp. 189a- 
189a). IEEE. 
Castillo, J. (2009). Research Population. Retrieved May 2,2010, from hap: 
//www. experiment-resources. com/research-population. html. 
Caudill, 
. 
1. (2007). The Growth of in-Learning and the Growth of Mobile Computing: 
Parallel developments. International Review of Research in Open and Distance 
Learning with mobile devices, 8(2). 
Chac, M., & Kim, J. (2004). Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical 
study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on 
user activities with standard web phones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 
23(3), 165-181. 
Chan, S. S., Fang, X., Brzezinski, J. R., Zhou, Y., Xu, S., & Lam, J. (2002). Usability for 
Mobile Commerce Across Multiple Form Factors. . 
1. Electron. 
Res., 3(3), 187-199. 
Commerce 
Chanchary, F. H., & Islam, S. (2011). Mobile learning, in Saudi Arabia-prospects and 
challenges. 
Cliemingui, H.. & Ben lallouna, H. (2013). Resistance, motivations, trust and intention to 
use mobile financial services. Interrtutioi7U/ 
Journal (? f B(Ink Marketing, 31(7), 574- 
592. 
Chen, H., & Huang, H. (2010). User Acceptance of Mobile Knowledge Management 
Learning System: Design and Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 
70-77. 
Chen, J., & Kinshuk, J. (2005). Mobile Technology in Educational Services. Journal of 
Lclucutlonul iLI11Iii171edia1 und H)pe1777edia, 14(1), 91. 
Chen, L.. Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2004). Consumer Acceptance of Virtual 
Stores: A Theoretical Model and Critical Success Factors for Virtual Stores. 
Database for Adi'unces in Iii! örnration Systems, 35(2), 5-31. 
202 
Chen. P. Y., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Measuring Switching Costs and the Determinants of 
Customer Retention in Internet-Enabled Businesses: A Study of the Online 
Brokerage Industry. InJiorinutron Systems Research, 13(3), 255-274. doi: 
10.1287/isre. 13.3255.78. 
Chen. W., Balijepally, V., & Sutanto, P. (2012). Does Mobile Technology Matter? A 
Student Centric Perspective. IBIM, 11 Business Review, (4241 56). 1-10. 
Cheon, 
. 
1., Sang No, L., Crooks, S. M. & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning 
readinessin higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers 
& L[h(cat1on, 59,1054-1064. (2012). 
Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging Technologies going to the MALL: mobile assisted 
language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9-16. 
Chiu. C. NI., & Wang, E. T. G. (2008). Understanding Web-Based Learning Continuance 
Intention: The Role of Subjective Task Value. 1n/orination and Management, 
45(3), 194-201. 
Chiu. C. M., I-Isu, M.. Sun. S. -Y.. Lin, T., & Sun, P. -C. (2005). Usability, Quality, 
Value 
and E-Learning Continuance Decisions. Computer & Education, 45(4), 399-416. 
Chong, J. L., Chong, A. Y. L., Ooi, K. B., & Lin, B. (2011). An empirical analysis of the 
adoption of m-learning in Malaysia. International Journal of Mobile 
Communications, 9(l), 1-18. 
Cisco System. (2003). Louisiana State University implements Cisco CTE 1400 series 
content lrans/ormation engines. Retrieved November 10,2009, from IMP: 
//www. cisco. com/warp/public/cc/pd/witc/cte 1400/prodlit/louis_bc. htm. 
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale 
development. Psychological As. sessm ent, 7(3), 309-319. 
Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. (2003). SPSS: Analysis Without Anguish: Version 11.0 for 
IVmclolls Milton, Australia: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 
Coakes, S., Steed, L., & Dzidic, P. (2006). SPSS 13.0: Analysis' without Anguish. 
Australia: John Wiley & sons Australia, Ltd. 
Cochrane, T. D. (2010). Exploring mobile learning success factors. ALT-J: Research in 
Learning 7echnola v, 18(2), 133-148. 
203 
Colley, J., & Stead. G. (2003). Take a bite: producing accessible lea sting materials for 
mobile devices. In Proceedings of MLEARN 2003: Learning with Mobile Devices. 
(pp. 43-46). London, UK. 
Collis, B., & Moonen,. 1. (2002). Flexible learning in a digital world. Open Learning: The 
Journal oC Open and Distance Learning, 17(3), 217-230. 
Collis, B., & Wender M. (2002). Models of technology and change in higher education: 
An international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in higher 
education [Electronic Version]. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies. 
Retrieved January 22,2009, from http: 
/ww-w. utwente. nl/eheps/documenten/ictrapport. pdf. 
Compeau. D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a 
measure and initial test. Ails Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. 
Conejar, R. , 
I., & Kim, H. K. (2014). The Effect of the Future Mobile Learning: Current 
State and Future Opportunities. International 
Journal of Softiiare Engineering & 
Its :1 pplications, S(S). 
Cooper, D. R.. Schindler, P. S., & Sun, J. (2003). Business research methods (S ed. ). New 
York: The McGraw-Hill/Irwin. 
Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Chan, T., & Bull, S. (2005). A Mobile Learning Organises- (or 
University Students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 162-169. doi: 
10.111 I /j. 1'165-2729.2005.00124. x. 
Cox, 
. 
1., & Dale, B. G. (2001). Service quality and e-commerce: an exploratory 
analysis. Managing Service 
Quality: An International Journal, 11(2), 121-131. 
Cronbach, L. 
. 
1. (1984). Essentials of Psychological Testing (4th Ed. ). New York: Harper 
and Roi'. 
Cruz, y., Boughzala, i., & Assar, s. 
(2014). Technology acceptance and actual use with 
mobile leaaning: first stage 
for studying the influence of learning styles on the 
behavioral intention. 
Dabholkar, P. A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self service 
options: an investigation of alternative models of service quality. International 
. 
Io11171a1 o/'RescarCI1 in Marketing, 
13(1), 29-51. 
204 
Daniel, R. (1961). Management Information Crisis. Harvard Bitshiess Review, 
September/October, I1 1-121. 
David. M.. King, M., & McAulay, L. (2000). Executives' use of information technology: 
Comparison of electronic mail and an accounting information system. Journal of 
in/0r71rrrtio/r Tcchnology, 15(2), 149-164. 
Davis, D., & Cosenza, R. M. (1993). Business research for decision makilrg. California: 
Wadsworth Publishing Company. 
Davis, F. D. (1986). A Teclinolog), Acceptance Model fir Empirically Testing New End- 
Uscr In/ürntation Svstenrs: Theory and Results. PhD PhD thesis, MIT Sloan School 
of'Management, Cambridge, MA 
Davis, F. D. P. U., (1989). Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information 
Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. ( 
Davis, F. D. P. U., Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information 
Technology. Iiitei 1Ulio/IQl Journal of 
Illl/ll(117-Co/111)i11C/' Inter aCllo/l, 7(l)., 57-78. 
(I 989). 
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Colllputer 
Technology: A Colllparlsoll of Two Theoretical Models. ý1lunnýcmerrt Science, 
35(S), 982-1003. doi: 10.1287/nlnsc. 35.8.982. 
Demb, A., Erickson, D., & Hawkins-Wilding, S. (2004). The laptop alternative: Student 
reactions and strategic implications. 
Computer and Education, 43(4), 383-401. 
Denk, M., Wcbcr, M., Benin, R. (2007). Mobile leaininb challenges and potentials, 
brternatiollal Journal ofMobile Learning and Organisation, 1(2), 122-139. 
Devellis, R. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Pcn"k, CA: 
Sage. 
Dhaha, 1. S. Y. A., & AL1, A. Y. S. (2014). Mediating effects of behavioral intention 
between 3g predictors and service satisfaction.. Iurual Komunikasi; Malaysian 
Journal of Conuuulricatiorn, 30,107-128. 
Dillon, A., & Mrn-ries, M. G. (1996). User Acceptance of Information Technology: 
Theories and models. Amnial Rel'ienr of Information Sciejrce and Technology, 
31(1), 3-32. 
205 
Din, R., Norman. I-I., Nordin, N., & Ryberg, T. (2014). A review on the use and perceived 
effects of mobile blogs on learning in higher educational settings. Asian Social 
Science, 10(1), p209. 
Donaldson, R. L. (201 1). Student acceptance of mobile learnin. PhD thesis, the Florida 
state university college of communication & information. 
Draper, N., & Smith, H. (1981). Applied Regression 
. Analysis 
(2 ed. ). New York: John 
Wily & Sons, Inc. 
Eccles, M. P., Hrisos, S., Francis, J. J., Stamp, E., Johnston, M., Hawthorne, G., (2011). 
Instrument development, data collection, and characteristics of practices, staff, and 
measures in the Improving Quality of Care in Diabetes (iQuaD) Study. 
Implementation Science, 6(1), 61. 
EI Saghier, N., & Nathan, D. (2013, April). Service Quality Dimensions and Customers' 
Satisfactions of Banks in Egypt. In Proceedings of 20th Lrternatiomrl Business 
Research Coi? lcrence, Duhcri, UAE (pp. 4-5). 
Elgort. 1. (2005). E-learning adoption: Bridging the chasm. In Proceedings of the 22nd 
. -lnnual 
Confcrencc of the Australasian Society . 
fcu- Computers in Learning in 
Tertiary Education. (pp. 181-185). Brisbane. 
El-Hussein. M. 0. M., and Johannes C. Cronje. (2010). "Defining Mobile Learning in the 
Higher Education Landscape. " Educational Technology & Society 13.3 (2010): 12- 
21. 
Einbi, M. A., & Nordin, N. M. (2013). Mobile learning: Malaysian initiatives and 
research findings. Malaysia: Centre for Academic Ach'ancement, Universiti 
Kehangsaan Malaysia, 1-131. 
Erez, M., & Earley, P. C. (1993). Culture, self identity, and work: Oxford University 
Press, USA. 
Farooq, U., Schafer, W., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). M-education: bridging 
the gap of mobile and desktop computing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International 
Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'02). (pp. 
91-94). Blacksburg, VA. 
Farrow, R. (2011). Mobile learning: a meta-ethical taxonomy. In Proceedings of'IADIS 
International Conference, Mobile Leariring. (pp. 2-10). Avila, Spain. 
206 
1~eng. H.. Hoegler. T.. & Stucky, W. (2006, June 26-27). E. vplorin the Critical Success 
[actors for : Alohile Commerce. Paper presented at the International Conference on 
Mobile Business (ICMB'06), Copenhagen, and Denmark. 
Flshbeln, M., & Ajzen, 1. ( 1975). Belief allitude, intention and behavior: An introduction 
to Ihcorv and research. Boston: Addison-Wesley. 
Fotouhi-Ghazvini, F., Earnshaw, R. A., Moeini, A., Robison, D., & Excell, P. S. (2011). 
From E-Learning to M-Learning-the use of Mixed Reality Games as a new 
Educational Paradigm. Will, 5(2), 17-25. 
Fryer, W. A. (2002). l'Virelcss computing: New opportunities and challenges in education. 
Retrieved November 2,2009, from http: 
//www. wtvi. com/teks/02 03 articles/wirelessfuture. html. 
Gaebel, M., Kupriyanova, V., Morais, R., & Colucci, E. (2014). E-learning in European 
Hiýýher Education Institutions. Brussels: Euuroj, eun Univ rsityAssocintioir. 
Gay. G.. Stefanone, M., Grace-Martin, M., & Hembrooke, H. (2001). The effects of 
wireless computing in collaborative learning environments. International Journal 
ro/ 1luinan-Gnnhutcr Interaction, 13(2), 257-276. 
Gay, L. R.. Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Echicational research: Competencies. for 
aitalvsis and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. 
Gay, L., & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and 
application. Upper Saddle, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 
Geddes, S. (2004). Mobile learning in the 21st century: Benefit fir learners. Knowledge 
Tree e -journal. Retrieved April 9,2007, fi-oin 
littps: //olt. qut. edu. au/ud1`/OLTCONFERENCEPAPERS/gen/static/papers/Cobcroft 
_OLT2006_paper. 
p dl'. 
Geetika, S. N., & Nandan, S. (2010). Determinants of customer satisfaction on service 
quality: a study of railway platforms in India. Journal of Public 
Transportation, 13(l), 97-113. 
Gefen, D. a. D., P. (2001). Customer Loyalty to ern Online Store: The Meaning of Online 
Service Quality pp. Paper presented at the Twenty-Second International 
Conference on Information Systems. 
207 
Geffen, D., & Straub, D. (2000). The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS 
Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption. Journal of the Association Tyr 
Information Systems, 1(8). 
Gelen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E- 
mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 
389-400. doi: 10.2307/249720. 
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2007). SPSS for Windows step by step a simple guide and 
reference 14.0 update. Boston, MA: Pearson Education. 
Georgicva, E., Smrikarov, A., & Georgiev, T. (2005, June 16-17). A General 
Classification of Mobile Learning Systems. Paper presented at the International 
Confcrencc on Computer Systems and Technologies - CompSysTech' 2005 Varna, 
Bulgaria. 
Ghobakhloo, M., Flong, T. S., Sabouri, M. S., & Zulkifli, N. (2012). Strategies for 
successful information technology adoption in small and medium-sized 
enterprises. In/ormution, 3(1), 36-67. 
Ghose, S., & Dou, W. (1998). Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of 
Internet presence sites. Journal of lldvcrtising Research, 38(2), 29-44. 
Goodman, S. E., R Green, J. D. (1992). Computing in the Middle East. Communications 
of the ACM, 35(8), 21-25. 
Goundar, Sam. (201 1). "What is the Potential Impact of Using Mobile Devices in 
Education?. " 
Grantham, A., & Tsekouras, G. (2005). Diffusing Wireless Applications in a Mobile 
World. Technology in Society, 27(1), 85-104. doi: 10.1016/j. techsoc. 2004.10.003. 
Gururajan, V. (2002). Knowledge management a new game in higher education: A 
discussion paper on the new trends of technology influencing the higher- education 
landscape. In Proceedings of the I1 th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Perth: 
Edith Cowan University. Retrieved May 22,2009, from http: 
//cea. curtin. edu. au/tltitlf2002/abstracts/gurw-ajanabs. html. 
Hair, . 
1. B., W. Babin, B. Anderson, R and Tatham, R (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis 
(Sixth, & international. E. N. J. P. E. 
208 
Hair. . 
1. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate Data 
Analysis frith ReadinI's (3rd cd. ). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. 
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data 
analysis. New York: Macmillion. 
l-lair, . 
1., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data 
Analysis (6th ed. ). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hull. 
Hair, J., Samouel, P., Babin, B., & Money, A. (2003). Essentials of Business Research 
Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 
Hainat, A., Embi, M. A., & Hassan, H. A. (2013). Preparing for Mobile Learning: A 
Readiness Study at University Kebangsaan Malaysia. In Embi, M. A. & Nordin, N. 
M. (Eds), Mobile learning: Malaysian initiatives and research findings. Malaysia: 
Centre for Academic Advancement, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 
Hamdan . 
Nur 
, 
Al., & Schaper, H., (2012). Seminar: Mobile Learning 2011/2012 
Computer-Supported Learning Research Group, Collaboration in Mobile Learning. 
Flasan, II.. & Ditsa, G. (1999). The impact of culture on the adoption of IT: An 
interpretive study. Intc'rnutional. loºu-nul o/Global In/brnnrtion Munugemeiºt, 7(1), 
5-15. 
I-Iashemi, M., Azizinezbad, M., Najati, V. and Nesari, A, J. (2011). What is Mobile, 
Learning and Capabilities? Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2477-, & 
2481. 
Hashim, Wan Fatimah Wan Ahmad, & Rohiza Ahmad. (2011). Usability Study of Mobile 
Learning Course Content Application as a Revision Tool. Lecture Notes in 
Computer Science (inciudIna subset es Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and 
Lecture Notes in Bioiuforlriutics), 7067,23-32. 
Hayes, B. E. (1998). Measuring customer satisfaction: Survey design, use, and statistical 
analysis methods. Milwaukee: ASO Quality Press. 
Henryson, S. G., analysis and using, data on test items. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed. ), 
Educational Measurement (2nd ed., pp. 153). Washington, D. C: Council on 
Education. 
209 
11i11. C. E., Loch, K. D., Straub, D. W., & El-Sheshai, K. (1998). A qualitative assessment 
of Arab culture and information technology transfer. Journal of Global hlfbi-oration 
Alanageinent. 6(3), 29-38. 
1-lilmi. M., Shahrier Pawanchik, and Yanti Mustapha. (2012). "Perceptions on Service 
Quality and Ease-of-Use: Evidence from Malaysian Distance Learners. " Malaysian 
Journal of'Distance Education . 
99-110. 
Ho, S., & Kwok, S. (2002). The attraction of personalized service for users in mobile 
commerce: an empirical study. ACM SlGeconr Exchanges, 3(4), 10-18. 
I-Iolstcde, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind. New York: 
; iIcGrait"-Hill. 
I-lolstede, G. J., . 
conker, C. M., & Verwaart, T. (2008). Long-term orientation in trade. In 
F. Hauser (Ed. ), Complexity and Artificial Markets (pp. 107-119): Springer, 
Ileiclelber,. 
Hoistedc. G.. H., & Geert, 1-1. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Di/erences 
in Work Related Values. Sage: Beverly Hills. 
Holstede, G., I-I., & Geert, H. (1984). Culture's Consequences: International Differences 
in IVork- Rclatcd Values Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications. 
1-lorng, C. F., & Horng, G. J. (2009). Web 2.0 and RuBee with NFC of Mobile Learning 
for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. International Journal of 
Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 3(2), 21-25. 
Howcrolt. B., Hamilton, R., & Hewer, P. (2002). Consumer attitude and the usage and 
adoption of home-based banking in the United Kingdom. The International 
Journal 0/Bank Marketing, 20(3), 111-12 1. 
Hsu. S. (2010). Developing a scale for teacher integration of information and 
communication technology in grades 1-9. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 
26(3), 175-189. 
1-luang, Y., Clemens, S. C., Liu, W., Wang, Y., & Prell, W. L. (2007). Large-scale 
hydrological change drove the late Miocene C4 plant expansion in the Himalayan 
foreland and Arabian Peninsula. Geology, 35(6), 531-534. 
Hunt. S., Sparkman Jr, R., & Wilcox, J. (1982). The pretest in survey research: Issues and 
preliminary findings. Journal oflvlarketing Research, 19(2), 269-273. 
210 
Hwang. G.. 1., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A 
review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of 
Lchicutionul Technology. 42(4), E65 E70. 
Hyldegaard, J., & Seiden, P. (2004). My e -journal-exploring the usefulness of 
personalized access to scholarly articles and services. Information Research, 9(3), 
181. 
lgbaria, M. Zinatelli, N., Craggy P., & Cavaye, A. (1997). Personal Computing 
Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model. MIS Quarterly, 
21(3), 279-305. doi: 10.2307/249498. (1997). 
line]. S. (1998). Myths and realities of distance learning [Electronic Version]. ERIC 
Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, Columbus, OH. ERIC 
No. ED4262 I 3. RetrievedJanuary24,2009, fi-omlittp: //eric. ed. gov/ERICDoes/data/eri 
cdocs2sgl/content_storage O1/0000019b/80/17/2f/9f. pdf 
Isaacs. S. (2012). Turning on mobile learning in Africa and the Middle East: Illustrative 
initiatives curd policy implications. UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile 
Learning, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: de 
Fontenot. viewed 12 November 2012, from http: //unesdoc. unesco. 
or(Y/imaýgcs/0021/002163/216359e. pdf.. 
Ismail, L. Bokhare, S. F., Azizan, S. N., & Azman, N. (2013). Teaching via Mobile 
Phone: A Case Study on Malaysian Teachers' Technology Acceptance and 
Readiness. Journal o/'Ethicatois Online, 10(1), n 1. 
Ismail. L. Gunasegaran, T., Koh P. P. & Idrus, R. M. (2010). Satisfaction of distance 
learners towards, mobile learning in the Universiti Sains Malaysia. Malaysia 
Jora-nu1 o/ E(lucalioital Technology, & 10(2), -. (2010). 
Ismail, I., Idrus, R. M., Ziden, A. A., & Rosli, M. (2010). Adoption of Mobile Learning 
Among Distance Education Students in Universiti Sains Malaysia. International 
Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 4(2), 24-28. doi: 
10.3991/ijim. v4i2.1 167. 
lyamu, T., & Mtshali, E. (2013). Understanding Mobile Technology for Service Delivery 
in Academic Library. Issues in In/brmation Systems, 14(2). 
Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the 
Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex roles, 44(5-6), 363-379. 
211 
Jairak, K.. Praneetpolgrang, P., & Mekhabunchakij, K. (2009). An Acceptance of Mobile 
Learning fin- Higher Education Students in Thailand. Paper presented at the Sixth 
International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, Thailand. 
Jeon. E., & Park, H. (2015). Factors Affecting Acceptance of Smartphone Application for 
Management of Obesity. Iiealthcare irr/inrmatics research, 21(2), 74-82. 
Johnson, C., & Lomas, C. (2005). Design of the learning space: Learning and design 
principles. Educause Review, 40(4), 16. 
Ju, T. L., Sriprapaipong, W., & Minh, D. N. (2007). On the success factors of mobile 
learning. In proceeding for the 5th International Conference on ICT and Higher 
Education, Bangkok. Retrieved from http: /phd- e%20Learning. pdf. 
it. siam. edu/Con ference2007/documents/On%20the%20Success%20Factors%2 
Oof%20Mobile`%20Learning. pdf 
Kaasinen. E. (2005). User acceptance of mobile services- value, ease of use, trust and 
ease of adoption. Doctoral Dissertation, Tampere University of Technology, 
Tampere, Finland. 
Kadirirc, J. (2007). Instant Messaging for Creating Interactive and Collaborative m 
L. ear111ing EnVIr011111ents. International Review of Research in Open and D SIQince 
Learning, 8(2). 
Katz, M. (2014). Lifelong, learning, and its support with new technologies. 
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology 
adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post- 
adoption beliefs. Mrs Ouarterly, 23(2), xx. 
Kargin, B.. Baso-lu, N., & Daim, T. (2009). Factors affecting the adoption of mobile 
services. International Journal of'Services Sciences, 2(1), 29-52. 
Karim, N. S. A., Darus, S. H., & Hussin, R. (2006). Mobile Phone Applications in 
Academic Library Services: a students' feedback survey. Campus-Wide 
In1U/711ation Systems, 23(l), 35-51. doi: 10.1 108/10650740610639723. 
. 
Katerina, P., & Stephanos, M. (2006). Critical Success Factors for the Del'elopnrent of 
Mohilc Learning Applications. In Proceedings of the 24th LASTED International 
Conference on Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications. (pp. 19-24). 
Innsbruck, Austria: ACTA Press. 
212 
Keegan, D. (1995). Distance education technology for the new millennium: Compressed 
video teaching. 
Keegan, D. (2002). The future of learning: From eLearning to m-Learning. Hagen, 
Germany: Fern Universidad. 
Kellerer, W., Wagner, M., & Balke, W. (2003). Preference-based session management for 
personalized services. In Proc. MoMI. uC 2003. Munich. Germany, from 
litti): //www.. ]')s. de/-b, ilke/L)al)ei, /'iiioiiiucO'). pdf. 
Kelman. H. C. C., identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. 
Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51-60. 
Kim, D., Rueckert, D., Kim, D. J., & Seo, D. (2013). Students' Perceptions and 
Experiences of Mobile Learning. Language, Learning & Technology, 17(3), 52. 
Kim, E., & Tadisina, S. (2005). Factors imJ)acting clistomers' initial trust in e-husinesses: 
an cntjfirical study. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on 
System Sciences - IEEE. (pp. I70b-170b). Hawaii, US. 
Kim, G., & On,,, S. M. (2005). An exploratory study of factors influencing m-learning 
success- Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(1), 92. 
Kim, S. H., Holmes, K., & Mims, C. (2004). Mobile wireless technology use and 
implementation: Opening a dialogue on the new technologies in education. Tech 
Trends, 49(3), 54-63. 
Kiln, S. H., Mims, C., & Holmes, K. P. (2006). An Introduction to Current Trends and 
Benefits of- Mobile Wireless Technology Use in Higher Education. RACE Journal, 
14(7), 77-100. 
Kleijnen, M., Wetzels, M., & De Ruyter, K. (2004). Consumer acceptance of wireless 
finance. Jour1ral of Fimincial Services Marketing, 8(3), 206-217. 
Klopier, E., Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2002). Environmental Detectives: PDAs as a 
window into a l'irtual simulated world. In Proceedings of International Workshop 
in Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE2002) (pp. 95-98). 
Sweden. 
Kofod-Petersen, A., Bye, G., & Krogstie, J. (2009). Implementing A Context-Sensitive 
; 1lohile Learning System. In Proceedings IADIS International Conference Mobile 
213 
Lea«ling2009. Barcelona, Spain, fi-oinhttp: //wwNw. idi. ntnu. no/-anderpe/publications/ 
MLEARN-2009-AKP-GGB-JK. pdf. 
Koivumäki, T., Annu Ristola, and Manne Kesti. "The perceptions towards mobile 
services: an empirical analysis of the role of use facilitators. " Personal and 
Ubiquitous Computing 12.1 (2008): 67-75. (2008). 
Kovaeiar, Z. l. (2005). The impact of national culture on worldwide egovernment 
readiness. Informing Science Journal, 8,143-158. 
Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. 
Edýýcýrtioýlul and Psychological Measurement, 30,607-6 10. 
Krüger, V. (2001). Main schools of TQM: 'tbe big five. The TOM Magazine, 13,146- 
1 55. 
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Lesley Shield. (2008). "An overview of mobile assisted language 
learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. " 
ReCALL 20.03 (2008): 271-289. 
Kuruuzum. A.. & Koksal. C. D. (2010). The impact of service duality on behavioral 
intention in hospitality industry. Lrternutionul Journal oýl3usirle.,, 5 and 
Management Studies, 2(1), 9-15. 
Lam, J., Yau, J., & Cheung, S. K. (2010). A review of mobile learning in the mobile age. 
In Hybrid Lew-ning (pp. 306-315). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 
Landor, P. (2003). Understanding the foundation of mobile content quality: u 
presentation of a new research field. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii 
International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 10 -16). Hawaii, US. 
Laurent, A. (1993). The cultural diversity of western conceptions of management. 
Iirternational Studies (f Managenneni and Organizations, 13,75-96. 
Lauricella, S., & Kay, R. (2010). Assessing laptop use in higher education 
classrooms: The Laptop Effectiveness Scale (LES). Australasian Journal of 
Educational 1 echnology, 26(2), 151-163. 
Lavoic, M. -C. (2007). enahling contextual in-Learning: Design recommendations . 
for a 
C'0111('Xt-(11)1)1'oJ)17atC' llsel' llllel: face enabling, mobile learning. Master Thesis, 
Concordia University(Canada). Canada. Retrieved from 
http: //proquest. umi. com. eserv. uum. edu. my/pgdweb? index=2&did=1379577331 &S 
214 
rchMode=1 &sid=2&Fmt= I4&Vlnst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName= 
PQD&TS=120 3408203&clientld=28929 
Learning and Skills Development Agency. (2003, Feb 2003). Mobile phones switch 
young people on to learning Retrieved October 2007, from 
littp: //www. Isda. orý,,. uL'tiles/pdf/press/7feb2003. doc 
Lee, H., Lee, Y., & You, D. (2000). The determinants of perceived service quality and its 
relationship with satisfaction. The Journal of'Seri'ices Marketing, 14(3), 217-231. 
Lee, J., & Suh, E. (2013). An Empirical Study of the Factors Influencing Use of Social 
Network Service. In PA CIS (p. 181). 
Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e- 
lcarning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Conilurters & 
Education. 5=4(2), 506-516. 
Li. X., Hess, T. J., McNab, A. L., & Yu, Y. (2009). Culture and acceptance of global web 
sites: a cross-country study of the effects of national cultural values on acceptance 
oCa personal web portal. ACM SIGNIIS Database, 40(4), 49-74. 
Li, Y.. & Ych. Y. (2009). Service quality's impact on mobile satisfaction and intention to 
use 3G service. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hcna'aii Internatioal Conference on 
Svsteni Sciences (pp. 1- 10). Hawaii, US. 
Liao, H. L., and Lu, H. P. (2008). The role of experience and innovation characteristics in 
the adoption and continued use of e-learning websites. Computers and Education, 
51(4), 1405-1416. 
Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating Students' Perceived Satisfaction, Behavioral Intention, 
and Effectiveness of E-Learning: A Case Study of the Blackboard System. 
Computers and Education, 51(2), 864-873. 
Lim, E. P. (2001). Mobile commerce: promises, challenges, and research agenda. Journal 
of Database R7anagement, 12(3), 4-13. 
Little, J. (2006). What we're learning from our mobility project(s) at The University of 
Tennessee [Electronic Version]. ELI 2006 Spring Focus Session. Retrieved April 
10,2009, available at http: //www. educause. edu/ii-/Iibi-ary/pdf`/EL16206. pdf. 
Liu, L., & Ma, Q. (2006). Perceived system performance: a test of an extended 
technology acceptance model. ACM SIGMIS Database, 37(2-3), 51-59. 
215 
Liu, Y., R. Han. S. (2010). Understanding the Factors Driving M-learning Adoption: a 
Literature Review. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(4), 210-226. doi: 
10.1 IOS/ 1065074 1 01 1073 761. 
Livingston, A. (2004). Smartphones and Other Mobile Devices: The Swiss Army Knives 
of the 21st Century. Edit cause Oiiarlerly, 27(2), 7. 
Llusar, J. C. B., & Zornoza, C. C. (2000). Validity and reliability in perceived quality 
measurement models. International Journal of Quality and Reliability 
Management Science, 17(8), 899-918. 
Loiacono, E., Watson, R., & Goodhue, D. (2002). WeBQual TM: A Web site quality 
instrument (Working paper). Worcester, MA: Worcester Polytechnic Institute. 
Long, P., & Ehrmann, S. (2005). The future of the learning space: Breaking out of the 
box. Educuuse Review, 40(4), 42-58. 
Lopez-Nicolas, C., Francisco J. Molina-Castillo, and Harry Bouwman. "An assessment of 
advanced mobile services acceptance: Contributions from TAM and diffusion 
theory models. " Jnfinrmation & Management 45.6 (2008): 359-364. (2008). 
Low, L., & O'Connell, M. (2006). Learner-centric design of digital mobile learning. 
Paper presented at the Online Learning and Teaching Conference - OLT 
Conference 2006, Brisbane, Australia. 
Lu, . 
1., Liu, C., Yu, C-S. & Wang, K. (2008). Determinants of accepting wireless mobile 
data, & services in China. Information & Management 45. 
Lu, J., Yao, J., Yu, C., 2005. Personal innovativeness social influences and adoption of 
wireless Internet services via mobile technology. Journal of Strategic, d'c 
hiforination System s 14. 
Lu, J., Yu, C. S., Liu, C., & Yao, J. E. (2003). Technology acceptance model for wireless 
Internet. Internet Research, 13(3), 206-222. 
Mac Callum, K., and Lynn Jeffrey, (2013).. "The influence of students' ICT skills and 
their adoption of mobile learning. " Ausiralasicin Journal o Educational 
Technology 29.3. 
Mahanta, D., & Ahmed, M. (2012). E-learning Objectives, Methodologies, Tools and its 
Limitaion. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring 
Engineering (IJITEE), ISSN, 2278-3075. 
216 
Malaysian Communications And Multimedia Commission (MCMC) (2012). Internet and 
Telecommunications Substitutions in Malaysia. Available at 
(http: //www. sknnn. (_, ov. mv/facts figures/stats/idev asp). 
Mardikyan, S.. Besiroýglu, B., & Uzmaya, G. (2012). Behavioral intention towards the use 
of 3G technology. Communiccitiorn. s o/'the IBIA'14,10. 
Matheos, K., Daniel, K., & McCalla, G. (2005). Dimensions for blended learning 
technology: Learners' perspectives. Journal of Learning Design, 1(1), 56-76. 
McGhee, R., & Kozma, R. (2001). New teacher and student roles in the technology- 
supported classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American 
Educational Research Association, Seattle. 
McKenzie, J. (2001). The unwired classroom: Wireless computers come of age. 
Educational Technology, 10(4), 19-28. 
McKinuny, P. (2003). Cutting the Cord: Faculty Response to Wireless Computer. In 
Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, HVper111edict and 
Teleconulnulications (pp. 88-91). Chesapeake, VA. 
McLean, N. (2003). The M-Learning Paradigm: an Overview A Report for the Royal 
Academy of Engineering and the Vodafone Group Foundation. L01761071, UK: 
O. vJnrd University Computing Services (OUCS). 
Menacer, M., Al Mogbel, A., Arbaoui, A., Elmarai, 0., & Abbachi, A. (2014). Ubiquitous 
Learning System (ULS) based on Adaptive Media Streaming techniques: Case 
study at Taibah University. Life Science Journal, 11(9). 
Meng, Z., Chu, J., & Zhang, L. (2004). Collaborative Learning System Based On 
Wireless Mobile Equipment's. Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1(1), 481- 
484. 
Meylani, R., Bitter, G., & Legacy, J. (2015). Desirable Characteristics of an Ideal Online 
Learning Environment. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(1), 203. 
Miller, G. A. (1996). How we think about cognition, emotion, and biology in 
psychopathology. Psychophysiology, 33(6), 615-628 
Miller. M. D., Rainer, R. K., & Corley, . 
1. K. (2003). Predictors of Engagement and 
Participation in an On-Line Course. Online Journal of Distance Learning 
Administration, 6(l). 
217 
Minister of Higher Education Malaysia (2010). Available at 
(http: //www. moe. gov. my/pdf/MOHE/guidebook pelajar_antarabangsa. pdf). 
Mirski, P.. 1., & Abfalter, D. (2004). Knowledge Enhancement on Site-Guests' Attitudes 
towards m-Learning. Paper presented at the Information and Communication 
Technologies in Tourism, Cairo, Egypt. 
Mitchell, A., Doherty, M., & Net, W. (2003). M-Learning support for disadvantaged 
young adults. Retrieved June 23,2009, from http: //www. m- 
leaining. org/reports. shtml. 
Mockus, L., Dawson, H., Edel-Malizia, S., Shaffer, D., An, J., & Swaggerty, A. (2011). 
The impact of mobile access on motivation: Distance education student 
perceptions. In 17th Annual Sloan-C Consortium International Conference on 
Online Learning, Lake Buena Vista, FL. Available at http: //wc. psu. edu/sloan. 
Moore, D., & Lockee, B. (1999). A Taxonomy of Bandwidth: Considerations and 
Principles to Guide Practice in the Design and Delivery of Distance Education. 
Unpublished manuscript: Portland State University. 
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the 
Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information 
System Research, 2(3), 192-222. doi: 10.1287/isre. 2.3.192. 
Mortera-Gutierrez, F. (2006). Faculty best practices using blended learning in e-learning 
. and face-to-face instruction. International Journal on E Learning, 5(3), 313-32' 
Mtebe, S., R. Raisamo, R. (2014). Investigating students' behavioral intention to adopt and 
use mobile learning in higher education in East Africa University of Dar es Salaam, 
Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development using Information 
and Communication Technology. 10(3), 4-20. 
Mulliah, A. (2006). Mobile collaborative peer learning in an apprenticeship context. 
Master of Science Master Thesis, University of Albera, Edmonton, Alberta, 
Canada. 
Muvinda. P. B., Lubeýga. J. T., Lynch, K., & van der Weide, T. (2010). Mobile learning 
objects deployment and utilization in developing countries. International Journal 
of'Cominrting uncl ICT Research, 4(1), 37-46. 
Myers. M., & Tan, F. (2002). Beyond Models of National Culture in Information Systems 
Research. Journal of Global Information Management, 10(l), 24-32. 
218 
Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). Literature review in 
mobile technologies and learning. A Report for ATESTA Future lab. Retrieved April, 
6, 
2009, ii-oinhttp: //www. futurelab. org. uk/resources/documents/lit reviews/Mobile R 
eview. pdf. 
Nan, Z., Xunhua, G., Guoging, C., & Gang, S. (2009). A MCT Acceptance Model from 
the Cultural Perspective and Its Empirical Test in the Mobile Municipal 
Administrative System Application. In Proceedings of the 2009 Eighth 
International Conference on Mobile Business (pp. 319-323). Dalian, China. 
Nassuora, A. B. (2012). Student's acceptance of mobile learning for higher education in 
Saudi Arabia. American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal, 4(2), 24-30. 
Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O. & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: issues and 
applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 
Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social Research Methods. Pearson Education Technology, 43(4), 
592-605. 
Nielson, . 
1. (1993). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufinan. NMC, & 
Educause. (2006). The 2006 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media 
Consortium, from http: //www. rune. org/pdf/2006_HorizonReport. pdf. 
Nomadic, G. (2004). Going nomadic: Mobile learning in higher education. Echt cause 
Review, 39(5), 28-35 
Norazab Mohd Suki, A. R. Eshaq, and Koo Ah Choo. (2010). "Using mobile device for 
learning: Students' perspective. " In Proceedings of the International Conference 
on e-Learning, pp. 291-299. 
Siraj, S., Alias, N., Isbulan, 0., Hussain, R. M. B. R.. Leng, C. H., & Dewitt, D. (2013). 
The Malaysian Online . 
Journal of Educational Technology. Technology, 1(4). 
Norman, N. (2011). Mobile Learning for the NHS: Research Report: Summary NHS 
South Central. 
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. London: McGraw-Hill Book Company. 
O'Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J. P., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., & Lefrere, P. (2003). 
Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment [Electronic 
Version]. MOBiLearn project reportD4.1 Retrieved June 10,2009, from http: 
219 
//www. mobilearn. org/download/results/public_deliverables/MOBIlearn_D4.1_Fina 
1. pd1'. (2003). 
O'Neill, M., Palmer, A., Charters, S., & Fitz, F. (2001). Service quality and consumer 
behavioral intention: an exploratory study from the Australian wine tourism sector. 
In Proceedings of* the Australia New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 
(ANZMAC) (pp. 1-5). Albany, New Zealand. 
Oliver, B., & Wright, F. (2002). The next big thing? Exploiting channels and handheld 
computers for student learning. In Proceedings of the 11th Teaching and Learning 
Forum, Perth, Western Australia. from http: 
//lsn. curtin. edu. au/tlt%tit2002/abstracts/oliverb-abs. html. 
Ong, C. S., & Lai, . 
1. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships 
among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 
816-829. 
Ong. C. S., Lai. J. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of 
asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. InJ rnuition & 
Managcment, 41(6), 795-804. 
J., Y. S. Poong and T. H. No, 2008.3G services adoption among university students: 
Diffusion of innovation theory. Communications otthe IBIMA, 3: 114-12 1. 
Oppenheim, C. (1998). The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research 
assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and 
archaeology. Journal of Documentation, 53(2), 477-487. 
Paliwal. S., & Sharma, K. K. (2009). Future Trend of Education-Mobile Learning 
Problems and Prospects. In Proceedings of International Conference on Academic 
Libraries (ICAL-2009) (pp. 111-113). Delhi, India. 
Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using 
SPSS for WIndows (versions 10 and 11): SPSS Student Version 11.0 for Windows. 
Open University Press. 
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using 
SPSS for Windows Version 15 (3 ed. ). UK: Open University Press. 
Parasuraman, A. (2004). Assessing and improving service performance or maximum 
impact: insights from a two-decade-long research journey. Performance 
AIeasiereinent and Metrics, 5(2), pp45-52. 
220 
Parasuraman, A.. Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale 
för i\'leasuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Relating, 
64(4), 35-48. 
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1994). Reassessment of expectations as a 
comparison standard in measuring service quality: implications for- further 
research. Journal o/'Mcrrketin 58(1), 111-124. 
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: a multiple-item scale 
for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233. 
Park, S. Y., Nam, M. and Cha, S. (2011). University Students? Behavioral Intention to 
Use Mobile Learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British 
Journal of Education Technology, 43(4), 592-605. 
Parsons. D., & Ryu, H. (2006). A ti-amework for assessing the quality of mobile learning. 
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference for Mobile Learning. City, New 
Zealand, retrievedfi-omhttp: //citeseerx. ist. psu. edu/viewdoc/download? doi=10.1.1.10 
8.2612 &rep= rep 1 &type=pdf. 
Parthasarathy, M.. & Bhattacheijee, A. (1998). Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in 
the Context of Online Services. hrformation Systems Research, 9(4), 362-379. doi: 
10.12$7/isre. 9.4.362. 
Patten, B., Sa'nchez, I... & Tangney, B. (2006). Designing collaborative, constructionist 
and contextual applications for handheld devices. Computers and Education, 46(3), 
294-308. doi: 10.1016/j . 
Phuangthong, D., R Settapon; Malisawan. (2005). "A study of behavioral intention for 
3G mobile Internet technology: Preliminary research on mobile learning. " 
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on eLe(7177i17 . 
for Knowledge- 
Base l Society, 
Pimpaka. "Mobile Learning: Designing a Socio-Technical Model to Empower Learning 
in Higher Education. " LUX: A Journal of Trans disciplinary Writing and Research 
from Claremont Graduate University 2.1 (2013): pp23. 
Pinkwart, N.. Hoppe, H., Milrad, M., & Perez, J. (2003). Educational scenarios for 
cooperative use of Personal Digital Assistants. Journal of Computer Assisted 
Learning. 19(3), pp 383-391. 
221 
Prensky, M. (2005). What Can You Learn from a Cell Phone? Almost Anything! 
Innovation: Journal of, Online Education, 1(5). Retrieved from 
http: //innovateonline. info/pdf/voll issues/What-Can You Learn from a_Cell_P 
hone Almost Anything!. pdf. 
Pulla, S. (2013). E-Learning unplugged: Discovering the potential of a mobile learning 
movement for Canada. http: //www. siomonnpulla. com/2013/10/07/e-learning- 
unplu, cs; ed-discovering=-potential-mobile-learning-movement-canada/. 
Punnoose, A. (2012). Determinants of intention to use eLearning based on the technology 
acceptance model. Journal o/ In/onuution Technoln 1, Education: Research, 1 1(1), 
301-337. 
Quinn. C. M. -L. M., Wireless, In Your Palm Learning. Fall 2000 Retrieved February 18, 
2008, from http: //www. Iinezine. com/2.1/features/cgmmwiyp. htm. 
Rahmati, N. (2008). National Culture and Adoption of Mobile Commerce: An 
Overview. Paper presented at the European an(I Mediterranean Conference on 
Information Systems 2008, Dubai, UAE. 
Ramayah, T.. & Ignatius. J. (2005). Impact of-perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use 
and perceived enjoyment on intention to shop online. ICFAI Journal of System., 
; Ilaitagement (1JSM), 3(3), 36-51 
Rani, M. A., Siddiquci, A. N., Awan, H. M., & Bukhari, K. (2012). Relationship between 
service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and revisit intention in hotel 
industry. Interdi. cciplinarv Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(8). 
788. 
Reamy, T. (2001). From information architecture to knowledge architecture. Intranet 
Professional, 4(5), 5-6. 
Rekkedal, T., & Dye, A. (2007). Mobile Distance Learning with PDAs: Development and 
testing of pedagogical and system solutions supporting mobile distance learners. 
International Rev'iew of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 51-74. 
Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social rei'olution. Cambridge MA: Perseus. 
Rich, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. 
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 
145-161. 
222 
Robertson, S., March 16,2008). Malaysia Education: strategic branding leads to growth 
in international student numbers 2006-2008 Retrieved November 21,2009, from 
http: //globalhighered. wordpress. com/2008/03/ 16/Malaysias-international-student- 
numbers-increase-by-30-between-2006-8/. 
Rogers. E. M. (1995). The Diffusion of hmovations (4th ed. ). New York: Free Press. 
Rogers, E. M. (? 003). The Diffusion ofhmovations (5th ed. ). New York: Free Press. 
Rogers, Y., Price, S., Harris, E., Phelps, T., Underwood, M., Wilde, D. & Michaelides, D. 
(2002). Learning through digitally-augmented physical experiences: Reflections on 
the Ambient Wood project. Equator IRC: available http: //www. equator. ac. 
uk/papers/Ps//2002-rogers-1. pdf [28th February, 2003]. 
Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-Learning Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital 
Age: New York: McGraw-Hill Professional. 
Rueckert, D., Kim, D. J., & Seo, D. (2013). Students' perceptions and experiences of 
mobile learning. Language, Learning & Technology. 17(3), 52. 
Saadc, R. G., Nebebe, F., & Tan, W. (2007). Viability of the technology acceptance model 
in multimedia learning environments: A, & comparative Study. Interdisciplinary 
Journal o/'Knowledge and Learning Objects, 175-184. (2007). 
Sachdev, S. B., & Verma, H. V. (2004). Relative importance of service quality 
dimensions: A multi-sectoral study. Journal ofService Research, 4(1), 93-1 16. 
Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2009). Communication between 
cultures. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. 
Sanou, B. "ICT facts and figures. " International Telecommunications Union (2013). 
Sarrab, M., Elgamel, L., & Aldabbas, H. (2012). Mobile learning (ni-learning) and 
educational environments. International journal of distributed and parallel 
svstenns, 3(4), 31-38 
Sekaran, U. (1992). Research methods for business: A Skill Building Approach (2nd ed. ). 
New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approaches. New 
York: John Wiley & Sons. 
??; 
Seppala, P., Sariola. . 
1., & Kynaslahti, H. (2002, August). Mobile Learning in Personnel 
Training of University Teachers. Paper presented at the IEEE International 
11'orkshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'02), V ixjö, 
Sweden. 
Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. 
Computers & Education, 34(3-4), 177-193. 
Sharpies, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. 
Computers & Education, 34(3-4), 177-193. 
Sharples, M. (2005). Learning as conversation: Transforming education in the mobile 
age. In Proceedings Seeing Understanding, Learning in the Mobile Age (pp. 147- 
152). Budapest. 
Sharplcs, M., Corlett, D., & Westmancott, O. (2002). The Design and Implementation of 
a Mobile Learning Resource. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6(3). 220-234. 
don: 10.1007/s007790200021. 
Shih. Hung, -Pin, (2008). "Using a cognition=motivation-control view to assess the 
adoption intention (or Web-based learning. " Computers & Ethication, 327-337. 
Shin, Dong-Hee. 2007. User acceptance of mobile Internet: Implication for convergence 
Shore, B., & Venkatachalanl, A. R. (1996). Role of national culture in the transfer of 
information technology. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5(1), 19-35. 
Shiner, C., winters, N., & West, M. (2012). The future of mobile learning: Implications 
lör policy makers and planners. 
Shuler, Carly. (2009). "Pockets of potential: Using mobile technologies to promote 
children's learning. " 
Singh, D., & Bakar, Z. A. (2007). Wireless implementation of a mobile learning 
environment based on students' expectations. International Journal of Mobile 
Learning and Organisation, 1(2), 198-215. 
Snichotta, F. (2009). An Experimental Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Applied 
Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(2), 257-270. doi: 10.1111/j. 1758- 
0854.2009.01013. 
Soliman, N. A. (2014). Using E-Learning to Develop EFL Students' Language Skills and 
Activate Their Independent Learning. Creative Education, 2014. 
224 
Sparta, P. (2009). Before you buy an e-learning system, think enterprise wide. Training & 
Development T+D. 56(7), 34-35. 
Srikes, M., Louvieris, P., & Collins, C. (2009). The impact of culture on mobile phone 
purchasing: A comparison between Thai and British consumers. In Journal 17t11 
European Con%erence on Information Systems.. 
Srite, M. (2000). The influence of nutionul culture on the acceptance and use of 
information technologies: An empirical study. Doctoral Dissertation, Tallahassee: 
The Florida State University. Check the city. 
Srite. M. (2006). Culture as an explanation of technology acceptance differences: 
empirical investigation of Chinese and US users. Australasian Journal 
lrrformutiorr Systems, 14(1), 5-26 
an 
of 
Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in 
technology acceptance. R7is Oucrrlerly, 30(3), 679-704. 
Stead, G. t. C. o. m., CapeTown. SoutliAfi-ica. http: //www. mleai-n. org. za/CD/papers/Stead. pdf. 
(2005). Moving mobile into the mainstream. Paper presented at the MLearn. 4 
thIVorld Conference oil m-Learning, Cape Town, South Aliica. 
http: /%www. mlearn. org. za/CD/papers/Stead. pdf. 
Stengel, D., Bhandari. M., & Hanson, B. P. (2009). Handbook Statistics and Data 
Management:. <I Practical Guide for Orthopaedic Surgeons (1st ed. ). New York: 
Thieme. 
Straub, D. W. (1994). The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan 
and the US. Information Systems Research, 5(l), 23-47. 
Straub, D., Keil , 
M., & Brenner, W. (1997). Testing the technology acceptance model 
across cultures: A three country study. Information & Management, 33(1), 1-11. 
Straub, D., Loch, K. D., & Hill, C. E. (2001). Transfer of information technology to 
developing countries: A test of a cultural influence model in the Arab World. 
Journal of Global Information Management, 9(2), 141-172. 
Straub, D., Loch, K., Evaristo, R., Karahanna, E., & Srite, M. (2002). Toward a Theory 
Based Definition of Culture. Journal of Global Iuförnration Management, 10(1), 
13-23. 
225 
Sundgvist. S., Frank, L., & Puumalainen, K. (2005). The effects of country 
characteristics, cultural similarity and adoption timing on the diffusion of wireless 
communications. Journal ofBusiness Research, 58(1), 107-110. 
Swaid, S., & Wigand, R. (2007). Key dimensions of e-commerce service quality and its 
relationship to satisfaction and Loyalty. And Institutions. In Proceetlhiggs (? /* the 
20th Bled e-Confereiice e-Mergence: Merging and Emerging Technologies, 
Processes, and Institutions (pp. 1-15). 
Swaminathan, V., Lepkowska-White, E. and Rao, B. P., "Browsers or Buyers in 
Cyberspace? An Investigation of Factors Influencing Electronic Exchange, " 
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 5, No. 2,1999. 
Swett, C. (2002). College students' use of mobile wireless-internet connections becomes 
more common height Riddcr Tribune Business Neu-s. 
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th Ed. ). United 
States o('Amcrica: Pearson Allyn and Bacon. 
'Faju(Ieen, S. A.. Basha, M. K., Michael. F. 0., & Mukthar, A. L. (2013). Determinant of 
mobile devices acceptance for learning among students in developing country. The 
*Ialuvsiurt Online Jorn-nnl o/lE(hicutio1tul Technolog}', 1(3), 17-29. 
Tan. F. B., & Chou, J. P. (2008). The relationship between mobile service quality, 
perceived technology compatibility, and users' perceived playfulness in the context 
of mobile information and entertainment services. Intl. Journal of Haunan- 
Computer Interaction, 24(7), 649-671. 
Taylor, J. W. (1974). The role of risk in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 38, 
54-60. doi: 10.2307/1250198 
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995a). Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience. MIS 
Ouarterl17,19(4), 561-570. doi: 10.2307/249633. 
Taylor, S., S, Todd, P. A. (1995b). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test 
of Competing Models. In/bui ation Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. doi: 
10.1257/isre. 62.144. 
Teaster, P., & Blieszner, R. (1999). Promises and pitfalls of the interactive television 
approach to teaching, adult development and aging. Ethicational Gerontology, 
25(8), 741-75 
226 
The Horizon Report. (2007). The New Media Consortium & the EDUCAUSE Learning 
Initiative. Retrieved March 2009 from littp: //www. nmc. or /pdf/200S-Horizon- 
Report. poý 
Tick, A. (2006). A Web-based E-learning Application of Self Study Multimedia 
Programme in Military English. In Proceedings of the 3rd Romanian-Hzrngcnrian 
Joint Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence-SACI 2006 (pp. 25-26). 
11, imisoara, Romania. 
Tolhurst. D., & Debus, R. L. (2002). Influence of prior knowledge, attitudes, ability, and 
activity structure on students' learning and use of software. Journal of Educational 
Computing Research, 27(3), 275-313. 
Tornatzky. L. G., & Klein. K. J. (1982). Innovation Characteristics and Innovation 
Adoption-Implementation: a Meta-Analysis of Findings. IEEE transactions on 
Eiigincering Alanagement, 29(1), 28-45. 
Traxler, J. (2003). Mlearning - Evaluating the effectiveness and the cost. In Proceedings 
q/'MLE 1RiV; Learning with Mobile Devices (pp. 70-71). London, UK. 
Traxler. J. (2005, June). Defining mobile learning. In LIDIS International Conrence 
Alohile Learning (pp. 261-266). 
Triantallllou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A. (2006,29 November -2 
December). CAT-MD: Computer Adaptive Test on Mobile Devices. Paper 
jnrc'sc'ntcd at the IV International Conk re77ce on Multimedia and ICTs in Education 
(m-ICTE2006), Seville, Spain. 
"I-rilonova. A., & Ronchetti, M. (2003). A general architecture for M-Learning. Journal of 
Digital Contents, 2(1), 31-36. 
Tung, F. C., Yu, T. W., & Yu, J. L. (2014). An Extension of Financial Cost, Information 
Quality and IDT for Exploring Consumer Behavioral Intentions to Use the Internet 
Banking. 111t('171Ql1o11C11 RC'17ei1' o/lllanuge111ent and Business Research, 3(2), 1229. 
Turkcr. A.. Gor"gun, 1., & Conlan, 0. (2006). The challenge of content creation to 
facilitate personalized e-learning experiences. International Journal on E- 
Learniug, 5(1), 1-17. 
Venkatesh. V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of 
Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481. doi: 
10.1111 J. 1540-5915.1996. tb01822. x. 
227 
Vrnkatesh. V., S: Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology 
Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. iWanagcnrent Science, 46(2), 
I S6--204. doi: 10.1287hnnsc. 46.2.186.1 1926. 
Vcnkatesh. V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of 
Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. *11S Onw-lerly, 27(3), 425-478. 
Vicga, , 
I., Kohno, T., & Potter, B. (2001). Trust (and mistrust) in secure applications. 
Communications o/the ACM, 44(2), 31-36. 
Vovoula. G. N. (2005). /l study of' mobile learning practices. MOB1 learn project. 
Retrieved Mav 12.2010, from littp: //www. mobilearn. org/download 
resultsýpublic (lei verables/N, 1OBIlearn_D4.4_Final. pdf. 
\Vakahiu. J., R Kangethe, S. (2014). EClicacy of online distance learning: Lessons from 
the I-li_ghcr Education for Sisters in Africa Program. European Journal of Research 
and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 2(1). 
\Valton. G.. Childs, S., & Blenkinsopp, E. (2005). Using Mobile Technologies to Give 
health Students Access to Learning Resources in the UK Community Setting. 
lieu/ih ln/ornnution and Libraries Journal, 22(2), 51-65. doi: 10.1111/j. 1470- 
3327 2005.00615. x. 
WVang. P. a. R., H. (2009). Not SMS, but Mobile Quizzes: Designing a mobile learing, 
application liar university students. lirternational Journal of Mobile and 
Organisation, 3(4), p. 
\Vang. Y. -S.. AVu, M. -C., & Wang, H. -Y. (2009). Investigating the Determinants and Age 
and Gender Differences in the Acceptance of Mobile Learning. British Journal of 
L'clucatiuual Tech nologý . 
40(1), 92-118. doi: 10.111 1/j. 1467-8535.2007.00809. x. 
Warshaw, P. R. (I ')SO). A new model for predicting behavioral intentions: An alternative 
to fishbein. , Journal o/ Marketing Research (. IRIR), 17(2 
Wentzel, P. (2005). Using Mobile Technology to Enhance Students Educational 
Experiences: Case Study from the EDUCAUSE Center for Applied 
Research. EC. -IR case study, 2,1-22. 
Williams, P. W. (2009). Assessing Mobile Learning E%Jectiveness and Acceptance. PhD 
thesis, George Washington University, Washington. 
Winkelstein. P. (2002). PDA Use among Medical Students and Residents. In Proceedings 
o/ the . -1.111. -  
2002 Amruul Svmposiwn (pp. 1200). US. 
228 
Winters. N. (2006). What is mobile learning? In M. Sharples (Ed. ). Bigo issues in mobile 
lcanrninw. Renricvrcl, May S. 2009 from hop: //telearn. noe-kaleidoscope. org. 
Wood. K. (200 3). Introduction to mobile learning (m learning) [Electronic Version]. 
FERL - Technology lör E-Learning, ßECTýI ICT Reseurch. Retrieved March 3, 
3009, from http: //CcrLbecta. org. ulJdisplay. cGn? page=65&catid=192&resid 
51 94&printablc= 1. 
Wu, I. -I I., & Wang, S. -C. (2005). What Drives Mobile Commerce? An Empirical 
[: valuation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. hrformation and 
. 
1fanugrnu nt, 42(5), 719-729. doi: 10.10 1 6/j. im. 2004.07.00 1. 
\\u_ . 
I. -I I., Wang. S. -C K Kao, M. 1-1. (2014) A Study of the Users Attitudes and 
Intentions toward 4G \ViMax. En-inec'rin anal Teclnrolo, gw, 7(6): 1247-125. 
Yadav. R. K. - 
& Dabhadc, N. (2013). Impact of' service quality on customer satisfaction 
of mobile users: a case study of Alitel. Inicr-nutiunul Journal (? /' Innovative 
1i cc arc h and StuJic s. 1 9-163. 
islam. A. A., & lahad. N. A. (2012). Factors for ECtectivc Mobile Computer support 
Collaborative Icarnin"i. (MCSCL). Jo1! nlul n/ Infiorination Svstcros Research and 
Innui"Otiun. ISSN. 22189-1158. 
& Hwang, 1. -H. (2010). Acceptance of mobile 
lcarninýý: A I: especification and Validation of Information System Success. 
Intcruational Journal of Behavioral, Cognitive, Educational and Psychological 
Sciences. 2(l), 55-59. 
R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed. ). Thousand Oaks: 
Su(, r l'uhliccrlioir. 
Yordanova. K. (2007). Mobile Lcarmng and Integration of Advanced Technologies in 
Fclucation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on 
Comluitcr Si-. stems anal ]echnolo, ies, Bulgaria. 
Yousuf. M. (2007). [flcctiveness of mobile learning in distance education. Turkish 
Online. Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE October 8(4). 
Yuen. 11. K.. R M'la. W. K. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. 
. Iour, º(I n/7ic/mnlnýt und 
leacher Education. 10,3(36-3S2). 
229 
Yllýn, S. C. Y., &- Yuen, P. K. (2003). PDAs as Educational Power Tools. Tech 
l )irrctioirs, 62(9), 14-17. 
Zaltnian. G.. &, Still, R. (1973). Theory of Diffusion. In S. W. T. S. Robertson (Ed. ), 
('oncunucr />cluuiior: Tiworeticul Sources (pp. 416-468). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 
Prentice-I fall 
Zander. U.. & Koput. 13. (I995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of 
on2anüational capabilities: An empirical test. Organi=alio» Science, 6(1), 76-92. 
Ziknuind, W. G. (? 003). Business Research Methods (7th ed. ). Toronto: Dryden Press.