Maizatul Farisah Mohd Mokhtar2025-10-062025-10-062025Maizatul Farisah Mohd Mokhtar. (2025). Digital Evidence and Whatsapp Messages in Civil Litigation: Reflections from GIIB Holdings Berhad v Wong Weng Yew & ORS [2025]. Seminar Antarabangsa Islam Dan Sains 2025 (SAIS 2025), 531–537. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SN6JaJp4OjO-505O0GGa06Ro1JnzHAeH3083-872Xhttps://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SN6JaJp4OjO-505O0GGa06Ro1JnzHAeHhttps://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/27690Seminar Antarabangsa Islam dan Sains 2025 (SAIS 2025) / “Transcending Generations: Naqli and Aqli asPillars of Ummah Transformation”. Editor: Siti Rubaini Mat , Umi Hamidaton Mohd Soffian Lee, Nur Ilyana Ismarau Tajuddin, Noorfajri Ismail, Azman Ab Rahman 9 September 2024 Anjuran: Persatuan Kakitangan Akademik Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (PKAUSIM),Fakulti Syariah dan Undang-Undang (FSU), Institut Fatwa dan Halal (iFFAH), USIMIn an increasingly digital age, the ephemeral nature of instant messaging often belies its profound legal significance. What happens, however, when seemingly deleted WhatsApp messages hold the key to unravelling complex civil disputes? This paper examines the critical role of WhatsApp messages, even those purportedly deleted, as discoverable evidence under Malaysian procedural law. Employing a qualitative research methodology centred on a detailed case study, the paper thoroughly analyses the High Court's pivotal decision in GIIB Holdings Berhad v Wong Weng Yew & Ors [2025]. The study scrutinises the judicial application of the Evidence Act 1950 and the Rules of Court 2012, particularly concerning the principles of admissibility, relevance, and authenticity of electronic records. The results demonstrate a significant judicial shift towards permitting targeted discovery of WhatsApp communications when clearly linked to the issues in dispute, acknowledging that such informal exchanges can constitute crucial probative evidence. The discussion further highlights the persistent legal and practical challenges inherent in relying on WhatsApp evidence, including authentication procedures under section 90A of the Evidence Act and the distinction between evidentiary weight and admissibility, especially given the ease of manipulation. This paper concludes that while Malaysian courts have shown commendable adaptability, clearer procedural guidance and robust authentication practices are imperative to ensure consistency, fairness, and the integrity of digital evidence in civil litigation, offering practical recommendations for legal practitioners navigating this evolving evidentiary landscape.en-UScivil litigationdigital evidenceEvidence Act 1950Malaysian court.text::conference output::conference proceedings::conference paper531537