Li Hui LingMohd Sukri HassanChe Wan Zanariah Che Wan NgahMehmet Ozturk2025-03-052025-03-052025-02-24Li, H.L., Mohd Sukri Hassan, Che Wan Zanariah Che Wan Ngah, & Mehmet Ozturk. (2025). A Maturity Model for the Accredited Food Laboratory in Malaysia: A Case Study. Malaysian Journal of Science Health & Technology, 11(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjosht.v11i1.45910.33102/mjosht.v11i1.459https://mjosht.usim.edu.my/index.php/mjosht/article/view/459/255https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/26480Malaysian Journal of Science Health & Technology, Volume 11 Issue 1 Page (109–121)<jats:p>A Maturity Model (MM) is essential for laboratories aiming to improve and compete globally. Despite being accredited for over 20 years, some laboratories lack evidence of system maturity necessary for international competitiveness. A higher maturity level indicates a robust quality management system, leading to improved efficiency, accuracy, and customer satisfaction, while also assuring stakeholders, such as customers and regulatory bodies, of the laboratory's commitment to continuous improvement. The MM is designed to assess the success of laboratory processes, management styles, and the development of quality management practices, based on the 4M model (Manpower, Method, Machine, Material). The MM was developed using Analytes Accurate Certain Score (AACS) for the ten most common tests and System Maturity Scores (SMS), which incorporate proficiency testing and audit scores over two accreditation cycles (six years). While the model identifies inefficiencies, it helps organizations pinpoint areas of improvement and devise strategies to enhance their operations. This study applied the MM to a commercial laboratory, ABC (anonymized), accredited since the early 1990s and having undergone eight assessment cycles. The laboratory was found to be at a “leading” maturity level with a score above 80%, although improvements are still needed. Key areas for improvement include: 1) **Manpower**: maintaining competent staff by adjusting management strategies, 2) **Method**: validating all in-house methods according to Analytical Laboratory Accreditation Criteria Committee (ALACC) guidelines, 3) **Machine**: applying good laboratory practices (GLP) for equipment sharing, especially for specific analytes, and 4) **Material**: ensuring metrologically traceable reference materials and proficiency testing for all analytes. These improvements will help the laboratory further enhance its global competitiveness.</jats:p>en-USmaturity modelanalytes accurate certain scoresproficiency testingaudit/assessment scorestext::journal::journal article::research article