Wan Kamal NadzifWan JamilRoshimah ShamsudinNorazmi AnasNurul Khairiah KhalidShahril Nizam Zulkipli2024-05-292024-05-292020Wan Jamil, W. K. N. ., Shamsudin, R. ., Anas, N. ., Khalid, N. K. ., & Zulkipli, S. N. (2020). Kajian Terhadap Perawi Layyin Dalam Hadith Mengenai Tayamum Selepas Wuduk: (Study On the Layyin Narrators in the hadith of Tayamum After Wudū’) . Journal Of Hadith Studies, 5(2), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v5i2.1172550-148810.33102/johs.v5i2.117https://journalofhadith.usim.edu.my/index.php/johs/article/view/117https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/14042Vol 5. No. 2 (December 2020)In Islamic jurisprudence there is a discussion about wiping over the bandage for the sick people. According to the school of Hanafi, Maliki and Hanbali wiping over the bandage without dry ablution is permissable while from the Syafiʻi’s school of thought it is compulsory to take dry ablution after wiping over the bandage. The source of this disagreement was two Prophetic traditions from Jarir and Ibn ʻAbbas which was narrated by lenient narrators. This article to study all these traditions based on the methodology of transmitters criticism and comparative narration. The findings show that Prophetic tradition from lenient narrator can only be accepted if the content of its narration similar to other narration. Based on the studied Prophetic tradition, the similarity narration is only for the first phrase and the story of one Companion who injured in his head. While the second phrase elaborating the way he should take purification does not have any corroboration. This article can clarify which method of ablution is most appropriate for sick people with bandage according to the objective of Syariah.enLenient; narrator; islamic jurisprudence; school of thought; dry ablution.Article375252