2025-01-222025-01-222024Kabiru Goje & Forat Mustafa (2024). موافقات الشيخ الألباني لحكم السيوطي على أحاديث الجامع الصغير من حديث 401 - 410: Al-Albānī’s Concurrences with al-Suyūṭī’s Rulings on the Ḥadīths in al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr: A Study of Ḥadīths 401 - 410. Maʿālim Al-Qurʾān Wa Al-Sunnah, 20(2), 220-246. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v20i2.47910.33102/jmqs.v20i2.479https://jmqs.usim.edu.my/index.php/jmqs/article/view/479/290https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/26146Maʿālim Al-Qurʾān Wa Al-Sunnah, Volume 20 Issue 2 Page (220-246)This study addresses the discrepancy between the symbolic notations employed by al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Suyūṭī in his rulings on selected hadith and the interpretations subsequently provided by Shaykh al-Albānī. Specifically, it examines hadith numbers 401 to 410 found in al-Suyūṭī’s al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr fī Aḥādīth al-Bashīr al-Nadhīr, with the aim of identifying instances where al-Albānī’s assessments align with Al-Suyūṭī’s judgments. Methodologically, the research adopts an inductive approach to analyse the chosen hadith, followed by a comparative examination of their symbolic evaluations as presented in al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr and in al-Albānī’s two works, Ḍaʿīf al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr wa Ziyādatuhu and Ṣaḥīḥ al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr wa Ziyādatuhu. The findings reveal that al-Albānī’s rulings concur with al-Suyūṭī’s in eight of the ten examined hadith, diverging in only two instances. In light of these results, the study encourages scholarly institutions to undertake a comprehensive comparative analysis of all remaining hadith in al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr, thereby advancing the precision and reliability of future evaluations.ArAl-SuyūṭīAl-Jāmiʿ al-ṢaghīrAl-AlbānīṢaḥīḥ al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr wa Ziyādatuhutext::journal::journal article::research article