Ab. Malik N.Lin S.L.Rahman N.A.Jamaludin M.2024-05-282024-05-28201312660392-s2.0-84870939250https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84870939250&partnerID=40&md5=7dedfa69aeaa988a5b1c17750d0b1ec2https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/9102This study was carried out to evaluate the microleakage of Class II cavities restored with various types of lining materials. Four types of composite resins (Esthet-X-Denstply, USA, FiltekTMZ350-3M ESPE, USA, Beautifil- Shofu, Japan and Solare P-GC, Japan) were used and the lining were the Fuji IXGP (GC, Japan), the Beautifil flow (Shofu, Japan), the FiltexTMZ350 flow (3M ESPE, USA) and the Esthet-X flow (Denstply, USA). All the specimens were thermocycled and immersed in 0.5% basic fuschin dye for 24 h. The microleakage was scored using the ISO microleakage scoring system. The data were entered using SPSS version 12.0 and analyzed using STATA software programme. This study showed that none of the materials used in this study was able to eliminate microleakage. However, it was shown that the glass ionomer cement was better in reducing the incident of microleakage at the cervical margin. Among the flowable composite resin, FiltexTMZ350 flow showed less microleakage at the cervical margin.en-USCervical marginClass II cavitiesFlowable composite resinGlass ionomer cementMicroleakagecavitycementcompositesoftwareArticle4551421