Publication: Statistical analysis of photovoltaic and wind power generation
dc.FundingDetails | Higher Education Research Council Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia | |
dc.FundingDetails | The author acknowledges financial support from FINEWSTOCH, a research project funded by the Norwegian Research Council and the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia. Fred Espen Benth and Ingrid Hob�k Haff are thanked for valuable guidance and discussions. The author is also grateful for comments and suggestions from an anonymous referee, which resulted in a significant and remarkable improvement of the original paper. | |
dc.citedby | 1 | |
dc.contributor.affiliations | Faculty of Science and Technology | |
dc.contributor.affiliations | University of Oslo | |
dc.contributor.affiliations | Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ibrahim N.A. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-28T08:28:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-28T08:28:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we do a comparison between maximal and daily average production of photovoltaic (PV) and wind energy based on a transmission system operator in Germany using statistical analysis with different seasonality functions. We adopt sun intensity as a seasonal function for PV and a trigonometric function for wind, while the deseasonalized data is modeled by an autoregressive process. The stochastic component of both energies is relatively well captured by a skew normal distribution. Further, a weak anticorrelation between residuals of PV and wind is found, which leads to the complexity of balancing supply of renewable energy. No clear copula pattern is detected between transformed residuals, but it exhibits seasonality in the dependence. We can exploit this feature as a risk management strategy, such as quanto options, for nonrenewable energy producers to hedge against high renewable energy generation. � 2018 Infopro Digital Risk (IP) Limited. | en_US |
dc.description.nature | Final | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3 (SEPTEMBER 2018) PAGES: 43-69 DOI: 10.21314/JEM.2018.178 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.21314/JEM.2018.178 | |
dc.identifier.epage | 69 | |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000442420100004 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 17563607 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85059818377 | |
dc.identifier.spage | 43 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059818377&doi=10.21314%2fJEM.2018.178&partnerID=40&md5=5dcd1ade18858c244cd1b469eb24353b | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/8856 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Infopro digital | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Energy Markets | en_US |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Autoregressive process | en_US |
dc.subject | Copula | en_US |
dc.subject | Photovoltaic power production | en_US |
dc.subject | Quanto options | en_US |
dc.subject | Skew normal distribution | en_US |
dc.subject | Wind power production | en_US |
dc.title | Statistical analysis of photovoltaic and wind power generation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |